Source author record

Lior Gishboliner

Lior Gishboliner appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

10works
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

10 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Set mappings for general graphs

The study of extremal problems for set mappings has a long history. It was introduced in 1958 by Erdős and Hajnal, who considered the case of cliques in graphs and hypergraphs. Recently, Caro, Patkós, Tuza and Vizer revisited this subject, and initiated the systematic study of set mapping problems for general graphs. In this paper, we prove the following result, which answers one of their questions. Let $G$ be a graph with $m$ edges and no isolated vertices and let $f : E(K_N) \rightarrow E(K_N)$ such that $f(e)$ is disjoint from $e$ for all $e \in E(K_N)$. Then for some absolute constant $C$, as long as $N \geq C m$, there is a copy $G^*$ of $G$ in $K_N$ such that $f(e)$ is disjoint from $V(G^*)$ for all $e \in E(G^*)$. The bound $N = O(m)$ is tight for cliques and is tight up to a logarithmic factor for all $G$.

preprint2022arXiv

A New Bound for the Brown--Erdős--Sós Problem

Let $f(n,v,e)$ denote the maximum number of edges in a $3$-uniform hypergraph not containing $e$ edges spanned by at most $v$ vertices. One of the most influential open problems in extremal combinatorics then asks, for a given number of edges $e \geq 3$, what is the smallest integer $d=d(e)$ so that $f(n,e+d,e) = o(n^2)$? This question has its origins in work of Brown, Erdős and Sós from the early 70's and the standard conjecture is that $d(e)=3$ for every $e \geq 3$. The state of the art result regarding this problem was obtained in 2004 by Sárközy and Selkow, who showed that $f(n,e + 2 + \lfloor \log_2 e \rfloor,e) = o(n^2)$. The only improvement over this result was a recent breakthrough of Solymosi and Solymosi, who improved the bound for $d(10)$ from 5 to 4. We obtain the first asymptotic improvement over the Sárközy--Selkow bound, showing that $$ f(n, e + O(\log e/ \log\log e), e) = o(n^2). $$

preprint2022arXiv

Asymptotics of the hypergraph bipartite Turán problem

For positive integers $s,t,r$, let $K_{s,t}^{(r)}$ denote the $r$-uniform hypergraph whose vertex set is the union of pairwise disjoint sets $X,Y_1,\dots,Y_t$, where $|X| = s$ and $|Y_1| = \dots = |Y_t| = r-1$, and whose edge set is $\{\{x\} \cup Y_i: x \in X, 1\leq i\leq t\}$. The study of the Turán function of $K_{s,t}^{(r)}$ received considerable interest in recent years. Our main results are as follows. First, we show that \begin{equation} \mathrm{ex}(n,K_{s,t}^{(r)}) = O_{s,r}(t^{\frac{1}{s-1}}n^{r - \frac{1}{s-1}}) \end{equation} for all $s,t\geq 2$ and $r\geq 3$, improving the power of $n$ in the previously best bound and resolving a question of Mubayi and Verstraëte about the dependence of $\mathrm{ex}(n,K_{2,t}^{(3)})$ on $t$. Second, we show that this upper bound is tight when $r$ is even and $t \gg s$. This disproves a conjecture of Xu, Zhang and Ge. Third, we show that the above upper bound is not tight for $r = 3$, namely that $\mathrm{ex}(n,K_{s,t}^{(3)}) = O_{s,t}(n^{3 - \frac{1}{s-1} - \varepsilon_s})$ (for all $s\geq 3$). This indicates that the behaviour of $\mathrm{ex}(n,K_{s,t}^{(r)})$ might depend on the parity of $r$. Lastly, we prove a conjecture of Ergemlidze, Jiang and Methuku on the hypergraph analogue of the bipartite Turán problem for graphs with bounded degrees on one side. Our tools include a novel twist on the dependent random choice method as well as a variant of the celebrated norm graphs constructed by Kollár, Rónyai and Szabó.

preprint2022arXiv

Counting Homomorphic Cycles in Degenerate Graphs

Since counting subgraphs in general graphs is, by and large, a computationally demanding problem, it is natural to try and design fast algorithms for restricted families of graphs. One such family that has been extensively studied is that of graphs of bounded degeneracy (e.g., planar graphs). This line of work, which started in the early 80's, culminated in a recent work of Gishboliner et al., which highlighted the importance of the task of counting homomorphic copies of cycles (i.e., cyclic walks) in graphs of bounded degeneracy. Our main result in this paper is a surprisingly tight relation between the above task and the well-studied problem of detecting (standard) copies of directed cycles in general directed graphs. More precisely, we prove the following: 1. One can compute the number of homomorphic copies of $C_{2k}$ and $C_{2k+1}$ in $n$-vertex graphs of bounded degeneracy in time $\tilde{O}(n^{d_{k}})$, where the fastest known algorithm for detecting directed copies of $C_k$ in general $m$-edge digraphs runs in time $\tilde{O}(m^{d_{k}})$. 2. Conversely, one can transform any $O(n^{b_{k}})$ algorithm for computing the number of homomorphic copies of $C_{2k}$ or of $C_{2k+1}$ in $n$-vertex graphs of bounded degeneracy, into an $\tilde{O}(m^{b_{k}})$ time algorithm for detecting directed copies of $C_k$ in general $m$-edge digraphs. We emphasize that our first result does not use a black-box reduction (as opposed to the second result which does). Instead, we design an algorithm for computing the number of $C_k$-homomorphisms in degenerate graphs and show that one part of its analysis can be reduced to the analysis of the fastest known algorithm for detecting directed cycles in general digraphs, which was carried out in a recent breakthrough of Dalirrooyfard, Vuong and Vassilevska Williams.

preprint2022arXiv

On $3$-graphs with no four vertices spanning exactly two edges

Let $D_2$ denote the $3$-uniform hypergraph with $4$ vertices and $2$ edges. Answering a question of Alon and Shapira, we prove an induced removal lemma for $D_2$ having polynomial bounds. We also prove an Erdős-Hajnal-type result: every induced $D_2$-free hypergraph on $n$ vertices contains a clique or an independent set of size $n^{c}$ for some absolute constant $c > 0$. In the case of both problems, $D_2$ is the only nontrivial $k$-uniform hypergraph with $k\geq 3$ which admits a polynomial bound.

preprint2020arXiv

Dichromatic number and forced subdivisions

We investigate bounds on the dichromatic number of digraphs which avoid a fixed digraph as a topological minor. For a digraph $F$, denote by $\text{mader}_{\vecχ}(F)$ the smallest integer $k$ such that every $k$-dichromatic digraph contains a subdivision of $F$. As our first main result, we prove that if $F$ is an orientation of a cycle then $\text{mader}_{\vecχ}(F)=v(F)$. This settles a conjecture of Aboulker, Cohen, Havet, Lochet, Moura and Thomassé. We also extend this result to the more general class of orientations of cactus graphs, and to bioriented forests. Our second main result is that $\text{mader}_{\vecχ}(F)=4$ for every tournament $F$ of order $4$. This is an extension of the classical result by Dirac that $4$-chromatic graphs contain a $K_4$-subdivision to directed graphs.

preprint2020arXiv

Oriented cycles in digraphs of large outdegree

In 1985, Mader conjectured that for every acyclic digraph $F$ there exists $K=K(F)$ such that every digraph $D$ with minimum out-degree at least $K$ contains a subdivision of $F$. This conjecture remains widely open, even for digraphs $F$ on five vertices. Recently, Aboulker, Cohen, Havet, Lochet, Moura and Thomassé studied special cases of Mader's problem and made the following conjecture: for every $\ell \geq 2$ there exists $K = K(\ell)$ such that every digraph $D$ with minimum out-degree at least $K$ contains a subdivision of every orientation of a cycle of length $\ell$. We prove this conjecture and answer further open questions raised by Aboulker et al.

preprint2016arXiv

Removal Lemmas with Polynomial Bounds

A common theme in many extremal problems in graph theory is the relation between local and global properties of graphs. One of the most celebrated results of this type is the Ruzsa-Szemerédi triangle removal lemma, which states that if a graph is $\varepsilon$-far from being triangle free, then most subsets of vertices of size $C(\varepsilon)$ are not triangle free. Unfortunately, the best known upper bound on $C(\varepsilon)$ is given by a tower-type function, and it is known that $C(\varepsilon)$ is not polynomial in $\varepsilon^{-1}$. The triangle removal lemma has been extended to many other graph properties, and for some of them the corresponding function $C(\varepsilon)$ is polynomial. This raised the natural question, posed by Goldreich in 2005 and more recently by Alon and Fox, of characterizing the properties for which one can prove removal lemmas with polynomial bounds. Our main results in this paper are new sufficient and necessary criteria for guaranteeing that a graph property admits a removal lemma with a polynomial bound. Although both are simple combinatorial criteria, they imply almost all prior positive and negative results of this type. Moreover, our new sufficient conditions allow us to obtain polynomially bounded removal lemmas for many properties for which the previously known bounds were of tower-type. In particular, we show that every {\em semi-algebraic} graph property admits a polynomially bounded removal lemma. This confirms a conjecture of Alon.

preprint2013arXiv

Deterministic vs Non-deterministic Graph Property Testing

A graph property P is said to be testable if one can check if a graph is close or far from satisfying P using few random local inspections. Property P is said to be non-deterministically testable if one can supply a "certificate" to the fact that a graph satisfies P so that once the certificate is given its correctness can be tested. The notion of non-deterministic testing of graph properties was recently introduced by Lovasz and Vesztergombi, who proved that (somewhat surprisingly) a graph property is testable if and only if it is non-deterministically testable. Their proof used graph limits, and so it did not supply any explicit bounds. They thus asked if one can obtain a proof of their result which will supply such bounds. We answer their question positively by proving their result using Szemeredi's regularity lemma. An interesting aspect of our proof is that it highlights the fact that the regularity lemma can be interpreted as saying that all graphs can be approximated by finitely many "template" graphs.