BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Lhouari Nourine

Lhouari Nourine contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Discrete Mathematicsmath.COData Structures and AlgorithmsComputational Complexity

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Enumerating maximal consistent closed sets in closure systems

Given an implicational base, a well-known representation for a closure system, an inconsistency binary relation over a finite set, we are interested in the problem of enumerating all maximal consistent closed sets (denoted by MCCEnum for short). We show that MCCEnum cannot be solved in output-polynomial time unless $\textsf{P} = \textsf{NP}$, even for lower bounded lattices. We give an incremental-polynomial time algorithm to solve MCCEnum for closure systems with constant Carathéodory number. Finally we prove that in biatomic atomistic closure systems MCCEnum can be solved in output-quasipolynomial time if minimal generators obey an independence condition, which holds in atomistic modular lattices. For closure systems closed under union (i.e., distributive), MCCEnum has been previously solved by a polynomial delay algorithm.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Dualization in lattices given by implicational bases

It was recently proved that the dualization in lattices given by implicational bases is impossible in output-polynomial time unless P=NP. In this paper, we~show that this result holds even when the premises in the implicational base are of size at most two. Then we show using hypergraph dualization that the problem can be solved in output quasi-polynomial time whenever the implicational base has bounded independent-width, defined as the size of a maximum set of implications having independent conclusions. Lattices that share this property include distributive lattices coded by the ideals of an interval order, when both the independent-width and the size of the premises equal one.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Hierarchical Decompositions of dihypergraphs

In this paper we are interested in decomposing a dihypergraph $\mathcal{H} = (V, \mathcal{E})$ into simpler dihypergraphs, that can be handled more efficiently. We study the properties of dihypergraphs that can be hierarchically decomposed into trivial dihypergraphs, \ie vertex hypergraph. The hierarchical decomposition is represented by a full labelled binary tree called $\mathcal{H}$-tree, in the fashion of hierarchical clustering. We present a polynomial time and space algorithm to achieve such a decomposition by producing its corresponding $\mathcal{H}$-tree. However, there are dihypergraphs that cannot be completely decomposed into trivial components. Therefore, we relax this requirement to more indecomposable dihypergraphs called H-factors, and discuss applications of this decomposition to closure systems and lattices.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

On the dualization in distributive lattices and related problems

In this paper, we study the dualization in distributive lattices, a generalization of the well-known hypergraph dualization problem. We in particular propose equivalent formulations of the problem in terms of graphs, hypergraphs, and posets. It is known that hypergraph dualization amounts to generate all minimal transversals of a hypergraph, or all minimal dominating sets of a graph. In this new framework, a poset on vertices is given together with the input (hyper)graph, and minimal ``ideal solutions'' are to be generated. This in particular allows us to study the complexity of the problem under various combined restrictions on graph classes and poset types, including bipartite, split, and co-bipartite graphs, and variants of neighborhood inclusion posets. We for example show that while the enumeration of minimal dominating sets is possible with linear delay in split graphs, the problem, within the same class, gets as hard as for general graphs when generalized to this framework. More surprisingly, this result holds even when the poset is only comparing vertices of included neighborhoods in the graph. If both the poset and the graph class are sufficiently restricted, we show that the dualization is tractable relying on existing algorithms from the literature.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Representations for the largest Extension of a closure system

We consider extension of a closure system on a finite set S as a closure system on the same set S containing the given one as a sublattice. A closure system can be represented in different ways, e.g. by an implicational base or by the set of its meet-irreducible elements. When a closure system is described by an implicational base, we provide a characterization of the implicational base for the largest extension. We also show that the largest extension can be handled by a small modification of the implicational base of the input closure system. This answers a question asked in [12]. Second, we are interested in computing the largest extension when the closure system is given by the set of all its meet-irreducible elements. We give an incremental polynomial time algorithm to compute the largest extension of a closure system, and left open if the number of meet-irreducible elements grows exponentially.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access