BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Leopold Verstraelen

Leopold Verstraelen contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.DGmath.OC

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

On Thurston's geometrical space form problem: on quasi space forms

A proposal is made for what may well be the most elementary Riemannian spaces which are homogeneous but not isotropic. In other words: a proposal is made for what may well be the nicest symmetric spaces beyond the real space forms, that is, beyond the Riemannian spaces which are homogeneous and isotropic. The above qualification of `'nicest symmetric spaces'' finds a justification in that, together with the real space forms, these spaces are most natural with respect to the importance in human vision of our ability to readily recognise conformal things and in that these spaces are most natural with respect to what in Weyl's view is symmetry in Riemannian geometry. Following his suggestion to remove the real space forms' isotropy condition, the quasi space forms thus introduced do offer a metrical, local geometrical solution to the geometrical space form problem as posed by Thurston in his 1979 Princeton Lecture Notes on `'The Geometry and Topology of 3-manifolds''. Roughly speaking, quasi space forms are the Riemannian manifolds of dimension greater than or equal to 3, which are not real space forms but which admit two orthogonally complementary distributions such that at all points all the 2-planes that in the tangent spaces there are situated in a same position relative to these distributions do have the same sectional curvatures.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

On the extrinsic principal directions and curvatures of Lagrangian submanifolds

From the basic geometry of submanifolds will be recalled what are the extrinsic principal tangential directions, (first studied by Camille Jordan in the $18$seventies), and what are the principal first normal directions, (first studied by Kostadin Trencevski in the $19$nineties), and what are their corresponding Casorati curvatures. For reasons of simplicity of exposition only, hereafter this will merely be done explicitly in the case of arbitrary submanifolds in Euclidean spaces. Then, for the special case of Lagrangian submanifolds in complex Euclidean spaces, the natural relationships between these distinguished tangential and normal directions and their corresponding curvatures will be established.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Notes on isotropic geometry of production models

The production function is one of the key concepts of mainstream neoclassical theories in economics. The study of the shape and properties of the production possibility frontier is a subject of great interest in economic analysis. In this respect, Cobb-Douglas and CES production functions with flat graph hypersurfaces in Euclidean spaces are first studied in [19,20]. Later, more general studies of production models were given in [4-10, 12, 21]. On the other hand, from visual-physical experiences, the second and third authors proposed in [14] to study production models via isotropic geometry. The purpose of this paper is thus to investigate important production models via isotropic geometry.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Laplace Transformations of Submanifolds

Let $x : M \to E^m$ be an isometric immersion of a Riemannian manifold $M$ into a Euclidean $m$-space. Denote by $Δ$ the Laplace operator of $M$. Then $Δ$ gives rise to a differentiable map $L :M \to E^m$, called the Laplace map, defined by $L(p)=(Δx)(p)$, $p\in M$. We call $L(M)$ the Laplace image, and the transformation $L :M \to L(M)$ from $M$ onto its Laplace image $L(M)$ the {\it Laplace transformation}. In this monograph, we provide a fundamental study of the Laplace transformations of Euclidean submanifolds.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access