Researcher profile

Leo Rebholz

Leo Rebholz contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Improved long time accuracy for projection methods for Navier-Stokes equations using EMAC formulation

We consider a pressure correction temporal discretization for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations in EMAC form. We prove stability and error estimates for the case of mixed finite element spatial discretization, and in particular that the Gronwall constant's exponential dependence on the Reynolds number is removed (for sufficiently smooth true solutions) or at least significantly reduced compared to the commonly used skew-symmetric formulation. We also show the method preserves momentum and angular momentum, and while it does not preserve energy it does admit an energy inequality. Several numerical tests show the advantages EMAC can have over other commonly used formulations of the nonlinearity. Additionally, we discuss extensions of the results to the usual Crank-Nicolson temporal discretization.

preprint2020arXiv

Anderson acceleration for contractive and noncontractive operators

A one-step analysis of Anderson acceleration with general algorithmic depths is presented. The resulting residual bounds within both contractive and noncontractive settings reveal the balance between the contributions from the higher and lower order terms, which are both dependent on the success of the optimization problem solved at each step of the algorithm. The new residual bounds show the additional terms introduced by the extrapolation produce terms that are of a higher order than was previously understood. In the contractive setting, these bounds sharpen previous convergence and acceleration results. The bounds rely on sufficient linear independence of the differences between consecutive residuals, rather than assumptions on the boundedness of the optimization coefficients, allowing the introduction of a theoretically sound safeguarding strategy. Several numerical tests illustrate the analysis primarily in the noncontractive setting, and demonstrate the use of the method, the safeguarding strategy, and theory-based guidance on dynamic selection of the algorithmic depth, on a p-Laplace equation, a nonlinear Helmholtz equation, and the steady Navier-Stokes equations with high Reynolds number in three spatial dimensions.