Source author record

Lee S. McDaniel

Lee S. McDaniel appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
1topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Generalized Linear Models for Longitudinal Data with Biased Sampling Designs: A Sequential Offsetted Regressions Approach

Biased sampling designs can be highly efficient when studying rare (binary) or low variability (continuous) endpoints. We consider longitudinal data settings in which the probability of being sampled depends on a repeatedly measured response through an outcome-related, auxiliary variable. Such auxiliary variable- or outcome-dependent sampling improves observed response and possibly exposure variability over random sampling, {even though} the auxiliary variable is not of scientific interest. {For analysis,} we propose a generalized linear model based approach using a sequence of two offsetted regressions. The first estimates the relationship of the auxiliary variable to response and covariate data using an offsetted logistic regression model. The offset hinges on the (assumed) known ratio of sampling probabilities for different values of the auxiliary variable. Results from the auxiliary model are used to estimate observation-specific probabilities of being sampled conditional on the response and covariates, and these probabilities are then used to account for bias in the second, target population model. We provide asymptotic standard errors accounting for uncertainty in the estimation of the auxiliary model, and perform simulation studies demonstrating substantial bias reduction, correct coverage probability, and improved design efficiency over simple random sampling designs. We illustrate the approaches with two examples.