Researcher profile

Laura Ellwein Fix

Laura Ellwein Fix contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Parameter identifiability of a respiratory mechanics model in an idealized preterm infant

The complexity of mathematical models describing respiratory mechanics has grown in recent years to integrate with cardiovascular models and incorporate nonlinear dynamics. However, additional model complexity has rarely been studied in the context of patient-specific observable data. This study investigates parameter identification of a previously developed nonlinear respiratory mechanics model (Ellwein Fix, PLoS ONE 2018) tuned to the physiology of 1 kg preterm infant, using local deterministic sensitivity analysis, subset selection, and gradient-based optimization. The model consists of 4 differential state equations with 31 parameters to predict airflow and dynamic pulmonary volumes and pressures generated under six simulation conditions. The relative sensitivity solutions of the model state equations with respect to each of the parameters were calculated with finite differences and a sensitivity ranking was created for each parameter and simulation. Subset selection identified a set of independent parameters that could be estimated for all six simulations. The combination of these analyses produced a subset of 6 independent sensitive parameters that could be estimated given idealized clinical data. All optimizations performed using pseudo-data with perturbed nominal parameters converged within 40 iterations and estimated parameters within ~8% of nominal values on average. This analysis indicates the feasibility of performing parameter estimation on real patient-specific data set described by a nonlinear respiratory mechanics model for studying dynamics in preterm infants.

preprint2019arXiv

Influence of image segmentation on one-dimensional fluid dynamics predictions in the mouse pulmonary arteries

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models are emerging as tools for assisting in diagnostic assessment of cardiovascular disease. Recent advances in image segmentation has made subject-specific modelling of the cardiovascular system a feasible task, which is particularly important in the case of pulmonary hypertension (PH), which requires a combination of invasive and non-invasive procedures for diagnosis. Uncertainty in image segmentation can easily propagate to CFD model predictions, making uncertainty quantification crucial for subject-specific models. This study quantifies the variability of one-dimensional (1D) CFD predictions by propagating the uncertainty of network geometry and connectivity to blood pressure and flow predictions. We analyse multiple segmentations of an image of an excised mouse lung using different pre-segmentation parameters. A custom algorithm extracts vessel length, vessel radii, and network connectivity for each segmented pulmonary network. We quantify uncertainty in geometric features by constructing probability densities for vessel radius and length, and then sample from these distributions and propagate uncertainties of haemodynamic predictions using a 1D CFD model. Results show that variation in network connectivity is a larger contributor to haemodynamic uncertainty than vessel radius and length.