Researcher profile

Larry Stockmaster

Larry Stockmaster contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
4topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Re-defining Radiology Quality Assurance (QA) -- Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Based QA by Restricted Investigation of Unequal Scores (AQUARIUS)

There is an urgent need for streamlining radiology Quality Assurance (QA) programs to make them better and faster. Here, we present a novel approach, Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Based QUality Assurance by Restricted Investigation of Unequal Scores (AQUARIUS), for re-defining radiology QA, which reduces human effort by up to several orders of magnitude over existing approaches. AQUARIUS typically includes automatic comparison of AI-based image analysis with natural language processing (NLP) on radiology reports. Only the usually small subset of cases with discordant reads is subsequently reviewed by human experts. To demonstrate the clinical applicability of AQUARIUS, we performed a clinical QA study on Intracranial Hemorrhage (ICH) detection in 1936 head CT scans from a large academic hospital. Immediately following image acquisition, scans were automatically analyzed for ICH using a commercially available software (Aidoc, Tel Aviv, Israel). Cases rated positive for ICH by AI (ICH-AI+) were automatically flagged in radiologists' reading worklists, where flagging was randomly switched off with probability 50%. Using AQUARIUS with NLP on final radiology reports and targeted expert neuroradiology review of only 29 discordantly classified cases reduced the human QA effort by 98.5%, where we found a total of six non-reported true ICH+ cases, with radiologists' missed ICH detection rates of 0.52% and 2.5% for flagged and non-flagged cases, respectively. We conclude that AQUARIUS, by combining AI-based image analysis with NLP-based pre-selection of cases for targeted human expert review, can efficiently identify missed findings in radiology studies and significantly expedite radiology QA programs in a hybrid human-machine interoperability approach.

preprint2020arXiv

A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial for Measuring Radiology Study Reporting Time on Artificial Intelligence-Based Detection of Intracranial Hemorrhage in Emergent Care Head CT

We propose Artificial Intelligence Prospective Randomized Observer Blinding Evaluation (AI-PROBE) for quantitative clinical performance evaluation of radiology AI systems within prospective randomized clinical trials. AI-PROBE encompasses a study design and a matching radiology IT infrastructure that randomly blinds radiologists for results provided by AI-based image analysis. To demonstrate the applicability of our evaluation framework, we present a first prospective randomized clinical trial on the effect of Intra-Cranial Hemorrhage (ICH) detection in emergent care head CT on radiology study Turn-Around Time (TAT). Here, we acquired 620 non-contrast head CT scans from inpatient and emergency room patients at a large academic hospital. Following acquisition, scans were automatically analyzed for the presence of ICH using commercially available software (Aidoc, Tel Aviv, Israel). Cases identified positive for ICH by AI (ICH-AI+) were flagged in radiologists&#39; reading worklists, where flagging was randomly switched off with probability 50%. TAT was measured as time difference between study completion and first clinically communicated reporting, with time stamps automatically retrieved from various IT systems. TATs for flagged cases (73+/-143 min) were significantly lower than TATs for non-flagged (132+/-193 min) cases (p<0.05, one-sided t-test), where 105 of 122 ICH-AI+ cases were true positive. Total sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy over all analyzed cases were 95.0%, 96.7%, and 96.4%, respectively. We conclude that automatic identification of ICH reduces TAT for ICH in emergent care head CT, which carries the potential for improving timely clinical management of ICH. Our results suggest that AI-PROBE can contribute to systematic quantitative evaluation of AI systems in clinical practice using clinically meaningful quantities, such as TAT or diagnostic accuracy.