Researcher profile

L. Leal-Taixé

L. Leal-Taixé contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

HOLISMOKES -- VII. Time-delay measurement of strongly lensed Type Ia supernovae using machine learning

The Hubble constant ($H_0$) is one of the fundamental parameters in cosmology, but there is a heated debate around the $>$4$σ$ tension between the local Cepheid distance ladder and the early Universe measurements. Strongly lensed Type Ia supernovae (LSNe Ia) are an independent and direct way to measure $H_0$, where a time-delay measurement between the multiple supernova (SN) images is required. In this work, we present two machine learning approaches for measuring time delays in LSNe Ia, namely, a fully connected neural network (FCNN) and a random forest (RF). For the training of the FCNN and the RF, we simulate mock LSNe Ia from theoretical SN Ia models that include observational noise and microlensing. We test the generalizability of the machine learning models by using a final test set based on empirical LSN Ia light curves not used in the training process, and we find that only the RF provides a low enough bias to achieve precision cosmology; as such, RF is therefore preferred over our FCNN approach for applications to real systems. For the RF with single-band photometry in the $i$ band, we obtain an accuracy better than 1\% in all investigated cases for time delays longer than 15 days, assuming follow-up observations with a 5$σ$ point-source depth of 24.7, a two day cadence with a few random gaps, and a detection of the LSNe Ia 8 to 10 days before peak in the observer frame. In terms of precision, we can achieve an approximately 1.5-day uncertainty for a typical source redshift of $\sim$0.8 on the $i$ band under the same assumptions. To improve the measurement, we find that using three bands, where we train a RF for each band separately and combine them afterward, helps to reduce the uncertainty to $\sim$1.0 day. We have publicly released the microlensed spectra and light curves used in this work.

preprint2020arXiv

HOLISMOKES -- IV. Efficient mass modeling of strong lenses through deep learning

Modelling the mass distributions of strong gravitational lenses is often necessary to use them as astrophysical and cosmological probes. With the high number of lens systems ($>10^5$) expected from upcoming surveys, it is timely to explore efficient modeling approaches beyond traditional MCMC techniques that are time consuming. We train a CNN on images of galaxy-scale lenses to predict the parameters of the SIE mass model ($x,y,e_x,e_y$, and $θ_E$). To train the network, we simulate images based on real observations from the HSC Survey for the lens galaxies and from the HUDF as lensed galaxies. We tested different network architectures, the effect of different data sets, and using different input distributions of $θ_E$. We find that the CNN performs well and obtain with the network trained with a uniform distribution of $θ_E$ $>0.5"$ the following median values with $1σ$ scatter: $Δx=(0.00^{+0.30}_{-0.30})"$, $Δy=(0.00^{+0.30}_{-0.29})" $, $Δθ_E=(0.07^{+0.29}_{-0.12})"$, $Δe_x = -0.01^{+0.08}_{-0.09}$ and $Δe_y = 0.00^{+0.08}_{-0.09}$. The bias in $θ_E$ is driven by systems with small $θ_E$. Therefore, when we further predict the multiple lensed image positions and time delays based on the network output, we apply the network to the sample limited to $θ_E>0.8"$. In this case, the offset between the predicted and input lensed image positions is $(0.00_{-0.29}^{+0.29})"$ and $(0.00_{-0.31}^{+0.32})"$ for $x$ and $y$, respectively. For the fractional difference between the predicted and true time delay, we obtain $0.04_{-0.05}^{+0.27}$. Our CNN is able to predict the SIE parameters in fractions of a second on a single CPU and with the output we can predict the image positions and time delays in an automated way, such that we are able to process efficiently the huge amount of expected lens detections in the near future.