Source author record

L. H. Amer

L. H. Amer appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
1topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2016arXiv

Optimum orientation versus orientation averaging description of cluster radioactivity

Background: The deformation of the nuclei involved in the cluster decay of heavy nuclei affect seriously their half-lives against the decay. Purpose: We investigate the description of the different decay stages in both the optimum orientation and the orientation-averaged pictures of the cluster decay process. Method: We consider the decays of 232,233,234U and 236,238Pu isotopes. The quantum mechanical knocking frequency and penetration probability based on the Wentzel-Kramers-Brillouin approximation are used to find the decay width. Results: We found that the orientation-averaged decay width is one or two orders of magnitude less than its value along the non-compact optimum orientation. The difference between the two values increases with decreasing the mass number of the emitted cluster. Correspondingly, the extracted preformation probability based on the averaged decay width increases with the same orders of magnitude compared to its value obtained considering the optimum orientation. The cluster preformation probabilities (Sc) obtained in the two considered schemes give more or less comparable agreement with the Blendowske-Walliser (BW) formula based on the preformation probability of Sa(ave.) obtained from the orientation-averaging scheme. All the obtained results, including those obtained in the optimum-orientation scheme, deviate substantially from the BW law based on Sa(opt.) obtained using the optimum-orientation scheme. Conclusion: In order to account for deformations of the participating nuclei, it is more relevant to calculate the decay width by averaging over the different possible orientations of the participating deformed nucleus, rather than considering the corresponding non-compact optimum orientation.