Source author record

Kshitiz Aryal

Kshitiz Aryal appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Cryptography and Security Artificial Intelligence

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works

2topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2026arXiv

A Survey of Agentic AI and Cybersecurity: Challenges, Opportunities and Use-case Prototypes

Agentic AI marks an important transition from single-step generative models to systems capable of reasoning, planning, acting, and adapting over long-lasting tasks. By integrating memory, tool use, and iterative decision cycles, these systems enable continuous, autonomous workflows in real-world environments. This survey examines the implications of agentic AI for cybersecurity. On the defensive side, agentic capabilities enable continuous monitoring, autonomous incident response, adaptive threat hunting, and fraud detection at scale. Conversely, the same properties amplify adversarial power by accelerating reconnaissance, exploitation, coordination, and social-engineering attacks. These dual-use dynamics expose fundamental gaps in existing governance, assurance, and accountability mechanisms, which were largely designed for non-autonomous and short-lived AI systems. To address these challenges, we survey emerging threat models, security frameworks, and evaluation pipelines tailored to agentic systems, and analyze systemic risks including agent collusion, cascading failures, oversight evasion, and memory poisoning. Finally, we present three representative use-case implementations that illustrate how agentic AI behaves in practical cybersecurity workflows, and how design choices shape reliability, safety, and operational effectiveness.

preprint2023arXiv

Analysis of Label-Flip Poisoning Attack on Machine Learning Based Malware Detector

With the increase in machine learning (ML) applications in different domains, incentives for deceiving these models have reached more than ever. As data is the core backbone of ML algorithms, attackers shifted their interest toward polluting the training data. Data credibility is at even higher risk with the rise of state-of-art research topics like open design principles, federated learning, and crowd-sourcing. Since the machine learning model depends on different stakeholders for obtaining data, there are no reliable automated mechanisms to verify the veracity of data from each source. Malware detection is arduous due to its malicious nature with the addition of metamorphic and polymorphic ability in the evolving samples. ML has proven to solve the zero-day malware detection problem, which is unresolved by traditional signature-based approaches. The poisoning of malware training data can allow the malware files to go undetected by the ML-based malware detectors, helping the attackers to fulfill their malicious goals. A feasibility analysis of the data poisoning threat in the malware detection domain is still lacking. Our work will focus on two major sections: training ML-based malware detectors and poisoning the training data using the label-poisoning approach. We will analyze the robustness of different machine learning models against data poisoning with varying volumes of poisoning data.

preprint2022arXiv

A Survey on Adversarial Attacks for Malware Analysis

Machine learning has witnessed tremendous growth in its adoption and advancement in the last decade. The evolution of machine learning from traditional algorithms to modern deep learning architectures has shaped the way today's technology functions. Its unprecedented ability to discover knowledge/patterns from unstructured data and automate the decision-making process led to its application in wide domains. High flying machine learning arena has been recently pegged back by the introduction of adversarial attacks. Adversaries are able to modify data, maximizing the classification error of the models. The discovery of blind spots in machine learning models has been exploited by adversarial attackers by generating subtle intentional perturbations in test samples. Increasing dependency on data has paved the blueprint for ever-high incentives to camouflage machine learning models. To cope with probable catastrophic consequences in the future, continuous research is required to find vulnerabilities in form of adversarial and design remedies in systems. This survey aims at providing the encyclopedic introduction to adversarial attacks that are carried out against malware detection systems. The paper will introduce various machine learning techniques used to generate adversarial and explain the structure of target files. The survey will also model the threat posed by the adversary and followed by brief descriptions of widely accepted adversarial algorithms. Work will provide a taxonomy of adversarial evasion attacks on the basis of attack domain and adversarial generation techniques. Adversarial evasion attacks carried out against malware detectors will be discussed briefly under each taxonomical headings and compared with concomitant researches. Analyzing the current research challenges in an adversarial generation, the survey will conclude by pinpointing the open future research directions.