BZPEER
More

Discover

About BZPEERSearchGraph

Research tools

HomeCollectionsResearchCollaborationPublish

Network

ExpertsCommunities

Opportunities

Listings

Account

Log inCreate account
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Krzystof Ulaczyk

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
astro-ph.GAastro-ph.SRastro-ph.COastro-ph.EP

Catalog footprint

Research overview

2works
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Is this your work?

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse papers

Published work

2 publications

preprint2020arXiv

OGLE-2018-BLG-1269Lb: A Jovian Planet With A Bright, I=16I=16 Host

We report the discovery of a planet in the microlensing event OGLE-2018-BLG-1269, with planet-host mass ratio q∼6×10−4q \sim 6\times10^{-4}, i.e., 0.60.6 times smaller than the Jupiter/Sun mass ratio. Combined with the GaiaGaia parallax and proper motion, a strong one-dimensional constraint on the microlens parallax vector allows us to significantly reduce the uncertainties of lens physical parameters. A Bayesian analysis that ignores any information about light from the host yields that the planet is a cold giant (M2=0.69−0.22+0.44 MJ)(M_{2} = 0.69_{-0.22}^{+0.44}\,M_{\rm J}) orbiting a Sun-like star (M1=1.13−0.35+0.72 M⊙)(M_{1} = 1.13_{-0.35}^{+0.72}\,M_{\odot}) at a distance of DL=2.56−0.62+0.92 kpcD_{\rm L} = 2.56_{-0.62}^{+0.92}\,{\rm kpc}. The projected planet-host separation is a⊥=4.61−1.17+1.70 aua_{\perp} = 4.61_{-1.17}^{+1.70}\,{\rm au}. Using {\it Gaia} astrometry, we show that the blended light lies ≲12 \lesssim 12\,mas from the host and therefore must be either the host star or a stellar companion to the host. An isochrone analysis favors the former possibility at >99.6%>99.6\%. The host is therefore a subgiant. For host metallicities in the range of 0.0≤[Fe/H]≤+0.30.0 \leq {\rm [Fe/H]} \leq +0.3, the host and planet masses are then in the range of 1.16≤M1/M⊙≤1.381.16 \leq M_{1}/M_{\odot} \leq 1.38 and 0.74≤M2/MJ≤0.890.74 \leq M_{2}/M_{\rm J} \leq 0.89, respectively. Low host metallicities are excluded. The brightness and proximity of the lens make the event a strong candidate for spectroscopic followup both to test the microlensing solution and to further characterize the system.

Open access
preprint2015arXiv

Interstellar Extinction Curve Variations Toward the Inner Milky Way: A Challenge to Observational Cosmology

We investigate interstellar extinction curve variations toward ∼\sim4 deg2^{2} of the inner Milky Way in VIJKsVIJK_{s} photometry from the OGLE-III and VVVVVV surveys, with supporting evidence from diffuse interstellar bands and F435W,F625WF435W,F625W photometry. We obtain independent measurements toward ∼\sim2,000 sightlines of AIA_{I}, E(V−I)E(V-I), E(I−J)E(I-J), and E(J−Ks)E(J-K_{s}), with median precision and accuracy of 2%. We find that the variations in the extinction ratios AI/E(V−I)A_{I}/E(V-I), E(I−J)/E(V−I)E(I-J)/E(V-I) and E(J−Ks)/E(V−I)E(J-K_{s})/E(V-I) are large (exceeding 20%), significant, and positively correlated, as expected. However, both the mean values and the trends in these extinction ratios are drastically shifted from the predictions of Cardelli and Fitzpatrick, regardless of how RVR_{V} is varied. Furthermore, we demonstrate that variations in the shape of the extinction curve has at least two degrees of freedom, and not one (e.g. RVR_{V}), which we conform with a principal component analysis. We derive a median value of <AV/AKs>=13.44<A_{V}/A_{Ks}>=13.44, which is ∼\sim60% higher than the "standard" value. We show that the Wesenheit magnitude WI=I−1.61(I−J)W_{I}=I-1.61(I-J) is relatively impervious to extinction curve variations. Given that these extinction curves are linchpins of observational cosmology, and that it is generally assumed that RVR_{V} variations correctly capture variations in the extinction curve, we argue that systematic errors in the distance ladder from studies of type Ia supernovae and Cepheids may have been underestimated. Moreover, the reddening maps from the Planck experiment are shown to systematically overestimate dust extinction by ∼\sim100%, and lack sensitivity to extinction curve variations.

Open access

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.