Source author record

Kresten Lindorff-Larsen

Kresten Lindorff-Larsen appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Dissecting the statistical properties of the Linear Extrapolation Method of determining protein stability

When protein stability is measured by denaturant induced unfolding the linear extrapolation method is usually used to analyse the data. This method is based on the observation that the change in Gibbs free energy associated with unfolding, $Δ_rG$, is often found to be a linear function of the denaturant concentration, $D$. The free energy change of unfolding in the absence of denaturant, $Δ_rG_0$, is estimated by extrapolation from this linear relationship. Data analysis is generally done by nonlinear least-squares regression to obtain estimates of the parameters as well as confidence intervals. We have compared different methods for calculating confidence intervals of the parameters and found that a simple method based on linear theory gives as good, if not better, results than more advanced methods. We have also compared three different parameterizations of the linear extrapolation method and show that one of the forms, $Δ_rG(D) = Δ_rG_0 - mD$, is problematic since the value of $Δ_rG_0$ and that of the $m$-value are correlated in the nonlinear least-squares analysis. Parameter correlation can in some cases cause problems in the estimation of confidence-intervals and -regions and should be avoided when possible. Two alternative parameterizations, $Δ_rG(D) = -m(D-D_{50})$ and $Δ_rG(D) = Δ_rG_0(1-D/D_{50})$, where $D_{50}$ is the midpoint of the transition region show much less correlation between parameters.

preprint2013arXiv

Protein structure validation and refinement using amide proton chemical shifts derived from quantum mechanics

We present the ProCS method for the rapid and accurate prediction of protein backbone amide proton chemical shifts - sensitive probes of the geometry of key hydrogen bonds that determine protein structure. ProCS is parameterized against quantum mechanical (QM) calculations and reproduces high level QM results obtained for a small protein with an RMSD of 0.25 ppm (r = 0.94). ProCS is interfaced with the PHAISTOS protein simulation program and is used to infer statistical protein ensembles that reflect experimentally measured amide proton chemical shift values. Such chemical shift-based structural refinements, starting from high-resolution X-ray structures of Protein G, ubiquitin, and SMN Tudor Domain, result in average chemical shifts, hydrogen bond geometries, and trans-hydrogen bond (h3JNC') spin-spin coupling constants that are in excellent agreement with experiment. We show that the structural sensitivity of the QM-based amide proton chemical shift predictions is needed to refine protein structures to this agreement. The ProCS method thus offers a powerful new tool for refining the structures of hydrogen bonding networks to high accuracy with many potential applications such as protein flexibility in ligand binding.