BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Klaus Jansen

Klaus Jansen appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Data Structures and AlgorithmsComputational Complexitymath.OCDiscrete Mathematics

Catalog footprint

What is connected

12works
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

12 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

A Practical 73/50 Approximation for Contiguous Monotone Moldable Job Scheduling

In moldable job scheduling, we are provided $m$ identical machines and $n$ jobs that can be executed on a variable number of machines. The execution time of each job depends on the number of machines assigned to execute that job. For the specific problem of monotone moldable job scheduling, jobs are assumed to have a processing time that is non-increasing in the number of machines. The previous best-known algorithms are: (1) a polynomial-time approximation scheme with time complexity $Ω(n^{g(1/\varepsilon)})$, where $g(\cdot)$ is a super-exponential function [Jansen and Thöle '08; Jansen and Land '18], (2) a fully polynomial approximation scheme for the case of $m \geq 8\frac{n}{\varepsilon}$ [Jansen and Land '18], and (3) a $\frac{3}{2}$ approximation with time complexity $O(nm\log(mn))$ [Wu, Zhang, and Chen '23]. We present a new practically efficient algorithm with an approximation ratio of $\approx (1.4593 + \varepsilon)$ and a time complexity of $O(nm \log \frac{1}{\varepsilon})$. Our result also applies to the contiguous variant of the problem. In addition to our theoretical results, we implement the presented algorithm and show that the practical performance is significantly better than the theoretical worst-case approximation ratio.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2025arXiv

Approximation algorithms for integer programming with resource augmentation

The classic algorithm [Papadimitriou, J.ACM '81] for IPs has a running time $n^{O(m)}(m\cdot\max\{Δ,\|\textbf{b}\|_{\infty}\})^{O(m^2)}$, where $m$ is the number of constraints, $n$ is the number of variables, and $Δ$ and $\|\textbf{b}\|_{\infty}$ are, respectively, the largest absolute values among the entries in the constraint matrix and the right-hand side vector of the constraint. The running time is exponential in $m$, and becomes pseudo-polynomial if $m$ is a constant. In recent years, there has been extensive research on FPT (fixed parameter tractable) algorithms for the so-called $n$-fold IPs, which may possess a large number of constraints, but the constraint matrix satisfies a specific block structure. It is remarkable that these FPT algorithms take as parameters $Δ$ and the number of rows and columns of some small submatrices. If $Δ$ is not treated as a parameter, then the running time becomes pseudo-polynomial even if all the other parameters are taken as constants. This paper explores the trade-off between time and accuracy in solving an IP. We show that, for arbitrary small $\varepsilon>0$, there exists an algorithm for IPs with $m$ constraints that runs in ${f(m,\varepsilon)}\cdot\textnormal{poly}(|I|)$ time, and returns a near-feasible solution that violates the constraints by at most $\varepsilonΔ$. Furthermore, for $n$-fold IPs, we establish a similar result -- our algorithm runs in time that depends on the number of rows and columns of small submatrices together with $1/\varepsilon$, and returns a solution that slightly violates the constraints. Meanwhile, both solutions guarantee that their objective values are no worse than the corresponding optimal objective values satisfying the constraints. As applications, our results can be used to obtain additive approximation schemes for multidimensional knapsack as well as scheduling.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

A PTAS for Packing Hypercubes into a Knapsack

We study the d-dimensional hypercube knapsack problem where we are given a set of d-dimensional hypercubes with associated profits, and a knapsack which is a unit d-dimensional hypercube. The goal is to find an axis-aligned non-overlapping packing of a subset of hypercubes such that the profit of the packed hypercubes is maximized. For this problem, Harren (ICALP'06) gave an algorithm with an approximation ratio of (1+1/2^d+epsilon). For d=2, Jansen and Solis-Oba (IPCO'08) showed that the problem admits a polynomial-time approximation scheme (PTAS); Heydrich and Wiese (SODA'17) further improved the running time and gave an efficient polynomial-time approximation scheme (EPTAS). Both the results use structural properties of 2-D packing, which do not generalize to higher dimensions. For d>2, it remains open to obtain a PTAS, and in fact, there has been no improvement since Harren's result. We settle the problem by providing a PTAS. Our main technical contribution is a structural lemma which shows that any packing of hypercubes can be converted into another structured packing such that a high profitable subset of hypercubes is packed into a constant number of special hypercuboids, called V-Boxes and N-Boxes. As a side result, we give an almost optimal algorithm for a variant of the strip packing problem in higher dimensions. This might have applications for other multidimensional geometric packing problems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

On Integer Programming, Discrepancy, and Convolution

Integer programs with m constraints are solvable in pseudo-polynomial time in $Δ$, the largest coefficient in a constraint, when m is a fixed constant. We give a new algorithm with a running time of $O(\sqrt{m}Δ)^{2m} + O(nm)$, which improves on the state-of-the-art. Moreover, we show that improving on our algorithm for any $m$ is equivalent to improving over the quadratic time algorithm for $(\min,~+)$-convolution. This is a strong evidence that our algorithm's running time is the best possible. We also present a specialized algorithm with running time $O(\sqrt{m} Δ)^{(1 + o(1))m} + O(nm)$ for testing feasibility of an integer program and also give a tight lower bound, which is based on the SETH in this case.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

The Double Exponential Runtime is Tight for 2-Stage Stochastic ILPs

We consider fundamental algorithmic number theoretic problems and their relation to a class of block structured Integer Linear Programs (ILPs) called $2$-stage stochastic. A $2$-stage stochastic ILP is an integer program of the form $\min \{c^T x \mid \mathcal{A} x = b, \ell \leq x \leq u, x \in \mathbb{Z}^{r + ns} \}$ where the constraint matrix $\mathcal{A} \in \mathbb{Z}^{nt \times r +ns}$ consists of $n$ matrices $A_i \in \mathbb{Z}^{t \times r}$ on the vertical line and $n$ matrices $B_i \in \mathbb{Z}^{t \times s}$ on the diagonal line aside. First, we show a stronger hardness result for a number theoretic problem called Quadratic Congruences where the objective is to compute a number $z \leq γ$ satisfying $z^2 \equiv α\bmod β$ for given $α, β, γ\in \mathbb{Z}$. This problem was proven to be NP-hard already in 1978 by Manders and Adleman. However, this hardness only applies for instances where the prime factorization of $β$ admits large multiplicities of each prime number. We circumvent this necessity proving that the problem remains NP-hard, even if each prime number only occurs constantly often. Then, using this new hardness result for the Quadratic Congruences problem, we prove a lower bound of $2^{2^{δ(s+t)}} |I|^{O(1)}$ for some $δ> 0$ for the running time of any algorithm solving $2$-stage stochastic ILPs assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH). Here, $|I|$ is the encoding length of the instance. This result even holds if $r$, $||b||_{\infty}$, $||c||_{\infty}, ||\ell||_{\infty}$ and the largest absolute value $Δ$ in the constraint matrix $\mathcal{A}$ are constant. This shows that the state-of-the-art algorithms are nearly tight. Further, it proves the suspicion that these ILPs are indeed harder to solve than the closely related $n$-fold ILPs where the contraint matrix is the transpose of $\mathcal A$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

New Bounds for the Vertices of the Integer Hull

The vertices of the integer hull are the integral equivalent to the well-studied basic feasible solutions of linear programs. In this paper we give new bounds on the number of non-zero components -- their support -- of these vertices matching either the best known bounds or improving upon them. While the best known bounds make use of deep techniques, we only use basic results from probability theory to make use of the concentration of measure effect. To show the versatility of our techniques, we use our results to give the best known bounds on the number of such vertices and an algorithm to enumerate them. We also improve upon the known lower bounds to show that our results are nearly optimal. One of the main ingredients of our work is a generalization of the famous Hoeffding bound to vector-valued random variables that might be of general interest.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Closing the Gap for Makespan Scheduling via Sparsification Techniques

Makespan scheduling on identical machines is one of the most basic and fundamental packing problems studied in the discrete optimization literature. It asks for an assignment of $n$ jobs to a set of $m$ identical machines that minimizes the makespan. The problem is strongly NP-hard, and thus we do not expect a $(1+ε)$-approximation algorithm with a running time that depends polynomially on $1/ε$. Furthermore, Chen et al. [3] recently showed that a running time of $2^{(1/ε)^{1-δ}}+\text{poly}(n)$ for any $δ>0$ would imply that the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) fails. A long sequence of algorithms have been developed that try to obtain low dependencies on $1/ε$, the better of which achieves a running time of $2^{\tilde{O}(1/ε^2)}+O(n\log n)$ [11]. In this paper we obtain an algorithm with a running time of $2^{\tilde{O}(1/ε)}+O(n\log n)$, which is tight under ETH up to logarithmic factors on the exponent. Our main technical contribution is a new structural result on the configuration-IP. More precisely, we show the existence of a highly symmetric and sparse optimal solution, in which all but a constant number of machines are assigned a configuration with small support. This structure can then be exploited by integer programming techniques and enumeration. We believe that our structural result is of independent interest and should find applications to other settings. In particular, we show how the structure can be applied to the minimum makespan problem on related machines and to a larger class of objective functions on parallel machines. For all these cases we obtain an efficient PTAS with running time $2^{\tilde{O}(1/ε)} + \text{poly}(n)$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

A Faster FPTAS for the Unbounded Knapsack Problem

The Unbounded Knapsack Problem (UKP) is a well-known variant of the famous 0-1 Knapsack Problem (0-1 KP). In contrast to 0-1 KP, an arbitrary number of copies of every item can be taken in UKP. Since UKP is NP-hard, fully polynomial time approximation schemes (FPTAS) are of great interest. Such algorithms find a solution arbitrarily close to the optimum $\mathrm{OPT}(I)$, i.e. of value at least $(1-\varepsilon) \mathrm{OPT}(I)$ for $\varepsilon > 0$, and have a running time polynomial in the input length and $\frac{1}{\varepsilon}$. For over thirty years, the best FPTAS was due to Lawler with a running time in $O(n + \frac{1}{\varepsilon^3})$ and a space complexity in $O(n + \frac{1}{\varepsilon^2})$, where $n$ is the number of knapsack items. We present an improved FPTAS with a running time in $O(n + \frac{1}{\varepsilon^2} \log^3 \frac{1}{\varepsilon})$ and a space bound in $O(n + \frac{1}{\varepsilon} \log^2 \frac{1}{\varepsilon})$. This directly improves the running time of the fastest known approximation schemes for Bin Packing and Strip Packing, which have to approximately solve UKP instances as subproblems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Fully Dynamic Bin Packing Revisited

We consider the fully dynamic bin packing problem, where items arrive and depart in an online fashion and repacking of previously packed items is allowed. The goal is, of course, to minimize both the number of bins used as well as the amount of repacking. A recently introduced way of measuring the repacking costs at each timestep is the migration factor, defined as the total size of repacked items divided by the size of an arriving or departing item. Concerning the trade-off between number of bins and migration factor, if we wish to achieve an asymptotic competitive ration of $1 + ε$ for the number of bins, a relatively simple argument proves a lower bound of $Ω(\frac{1}ε)$ for the migration factor. We establish a nearly matching upper bound of $O(\frac{1}ε^4 \log \frac{1}ε)$ using a new dynamic rounding technique and new ideas to handle small items in a dynamic setting such that no amortization is needed. The running time of our algorithm is polynomial in the number of items $n$ and in $\frac{1}ε$. The previous best trade-off was for an asymptotic competitive ratio of $\frac{5}{4}$ for the bins (rather than $1+ε$) and needed an amortized number of $O(\log n)$ repackings (while in our scheme the number of repackings is independent of $n$ and non-amortized).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

A Robust AFPTAS for Online Bin Packing with Polynomial Migration

In this paper we develop general LP and ILP techniques to find an approximate solution with improved objective value close to an existing solution. The task of improving an approximate solution is closely related to a classical theorem of Cook et al. in the sensitivity analysis for LPs and ILPs. This result is often applied in designing robust algorithms for online problems. We apply our new techniques to the online bin packing problem, where it is allowed to reassign a certain number of items, measured by the migration factor. The migration factor is defined by the total size of reassigned items divided by the size of the arriving item. We obtain a robust asymptotic fully polynomial time approximation scheme (AFPTAS) for the online bin packing problem with migration factor bounded by a polynomial in $\frac{1}ε$. This answers an open question stated by Epstein and Levin in the affirmative. As a byproduct we prove an approximate variant of the sensitivity theorem by Cook at el. for linear programs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

On the optimality of approximation schemes for the classical scheduling problem

We consider the classical scheduling problem on parallel identical machines to minimize the makespan, and achieve the following results under the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) 1. The scheduling problem on a constant number $m$ of identical machines, which is denoted as $Pm||C_{max}$, is known to admit a fully polynomial time approximation scheme (FPTAS) of running time $O(n) + (1/ε)^{O(m)}$ (indeed, the algorithm works for an even more general problem where machines are unrelated). We prove this algorithm is essentially the best possible in the sense that a $(1/ε)^{O(m^{1-δ})}+n^{O(1)}$ time FPTAS for any $δ>0$ implies that ETH fails. 2. The scheduling problem on an arbitrary number of identical machines, which is denoted as $P||C_{max}$, is known to admit a polynomial time approximation scheme (PTAS) of running time $2^{O(1/ε^2\log^3(1/ε))}+n^{O(1)}$. We prove this algorithm is nearly optimal in the sense that a $2^{O((1/ε)^{1-δ})}+n^{O(1)}$ time PTAS for any $δ>0$ implies that ETH fails, leaving a small room for improvement. To obtain these results we will provide two new reductions from 3SAT, one for $Pm||C_{max}$ and another for $P||C_{max}$. Indeed, the new reductions explore the structure of scheduling problems and can also lead to other interesting results. For example, using the framework of our reduction for $P||C_{max}$, Chen et al. (arXiv:1306.3727) is able to prove the APX-hardness of the scheduling problem in which the matrix of job processing times $P=(p_{ij})_{m\times n}$ is of rank 3, solving the open problem mentioned by Bhaskara et al. (SODA 2013).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access