BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Klaus Jansen

Klaus Jansen contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Data Structures and Algorithmsmath.OCComputational ComplexityDiscrete Mathematics

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

A Practical 73/50 Approximation for Contiguous Monotone Moldable Job Scheduling

In moldable job scheduling, we are provided $m$ identical machines and $n$ jobs that can be executed on a variable number of machines. The execution time of each job depends on the number of machines assigned to execute that job. For the specific problem of monotone moldable job scheduling, jobs are assumed to have a processing time that is non-increasing in the number of machines. The previous best-known algorithms are: (1) a polynomial-time approximation scheme with time complexity $Ω(n^{g(1/\varepsilon)})$, where $g(\cdot)$ is a super-exponential function [Jansen and Thöle '08; Jansen and Land '18], (2) a fully polynomial approximation scheme for the case of $m \geq 8\frac{n}{\varepsilon}$ [Jansen and Land '18], and (3) a $\frac{3}{2}$ approximation with time complexity $O(nm\log(mn))$ [Wu, Zhang, and Chen '23]. We present a new practically efficient algorithm with an approximation ratio of $\approx (1.4593 + \varepsilon)$ and a time complexity of $O(nm \log \frac{1}{\varepsilon})$. Our result also applies to the contiguous variant of the problem. In addition to our theoretical results, we implement the presented algorithm and show that the practical performance is significantly better than the theoretical worst-case approximation ratio.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2025arXiv

Approximation algorithms for integer programming with resource augmentation

The classic algorithm [Papadimitriou, J.ACM '81] for IPs has a running time $n^{O(m)}(m\cdot\max\{Δ,\|\textbf{b}\|_{\infty}\})^{O(m^2)}$, where $m$ is the number of constraints, $n$ is the number of variables, and $Δ$ and $\|\textbf{b}\|_{\infty}$ are, respectively, the largest absolute values among the entries in the constraint matrix and the right-hand side vector of the constraint. The running time is exponential in $m$, and becomes pseudo-polynomial if $m$ is a constant. In recent years, there has been extensive research on FPT (fixed parameter tractable) algorithms for the so-called $n$-fold IPs, which may possess a large number of constraints, but the constraint matrix satisfies a specific block structure. It is remarkable that these FPT algorithms take as parameters $Δ$ and the number of rows and columns of some small submatrices. If $Δ$ is not treated as a parameter, then the running time becomes pseudo-polynomial even if all the other parameters are taken as constants. This paper explores the trade-off between time and accuracy in solving an IP. We show that, for arbitrary small $\varepsilon>0$, there exists an algorithm for IPs with $m$ constraints that runs in ${f(m,\varepsilon)}\cdot\textnormal{poly}(|I|)$ time, and returns a near-feasible solution that violates the constraints by at most $\varepsilonΔ$. Furthermore, for $n$-fold IPs, we establish a similar result -- our algorithm runs in time that depends on the number of rows and columns of small submatrices together with $1/\varepsilon$, and returns a solution that slightly violates the constraints. Meanwhile, both solutions guarantee that their objective values are no worse than the corresponding optimal objective values satisfying the constraints. As applications, our results can be used to obtain additive approximation schemes for multidimensional knapsack as well as scheduling.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

A PTAS for Packing Hypercubes into a Knapsack

We study the d-dimensional hypercube knapsack problem where we are given a set of d-dimensional hypercubes with associated profits, and a knapsack which is a unit d-dimensional hypercube. The goal is to find an axis-aligned non-overlapping packing of a subset of hypercubes such that the profit of the packed hypercubes is maximized. For this problem, Harren (ICALP'06) gave an algorithm with an approximation ratio of (1+1/2^d+epsilon). For d=2, Jansen and Solis-Oba (IPCO'08) showed that the problem admits a polynomial-time approximation scheme (PTAS); Heydrich and Wiese (SODA'17) further improved the running time and gave an efficient polynomial-time approximation scheme (EPTAS). Both the results use structural properties of 2-D packing, which do not generalize to higher dimensions. For d>2, it remains open to obtain a PTAS, and in fact, there has been no improvement since Harren's result. We settle the problem by providing a PTAS. Our main technical contribution is a structural lemma which shows that any packing of hypercubes can be converted into another structured packing such that a high profitable subset of hypercubes is packed into a constant number of special hypercuboids, called V-Boxes and N-Boxes. As a side result, we give an almost optimal algorithm for a variant of the strip packing problem in higher dimensions. This might have applications for other multidimensional geometric packing problems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

On Integer Programming, Discrepancy, and Convolution

Integer programs with m constraints are solvable in pseudo-polynomial time in $Δ$, the largest coefficient in a constraint, when m is a fixed constant. We give a new algorithm with a running time of $O(\sqrt{m}Δ)^{2m} + O(nm)$, which improves on the state-of-the-art. Moreover, we show that improving on our algorithm for any $m$ is equivalent to improving over the quadratic time algorithm for $(\min,~+)$-convolution. This is a strong evidence that our algorithm's running time is the best possible. We also present a specialized algorithm with running time $O(\sqrt{m} Δ)^{(1 + o(1))m} + O(nm)$ for testing feasibility of an integer program and also give a tight lower bound, which is based on the SETH in this case.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

The Double Exponential Runtime is Tight for 2-Stage Stochastic ILPs

We consider fundamental algorithmic number theoretic problems and their relation to a class of block structured Integer Linear Programs (ILPs) called $2$-stage stochastic. A $2$-stage stochastic ILP is an integer program of the form $\min \{c^T x \mid \mathcal{A} x = b, \ell \leq x \leq u, x \in \mathbb{Z}^{r + ns} \}$ where the constraint matrix $\mathcal{A} \in \mathbb{Z}^{nt \times r +ns}$ consists of $n$ matrices $A_i \in \mathbb{Z}^{t \times r}$ on the vertical line and $n$ matrices $B_i \in \mathbb{Z}^{t \times s}$ on the diagonal line aside. First, we show a stronger hardness result for a number theoretic problem called Quadratic Congruences where the objective is to compute a number $z \leq γ$ satisfying $z^2 \equiv α\bmod β$ for given $α, β, γ\in \mathbb{Z}$. This problem was proven to be NP-hard already in 1978 by Manders and Adleman. However, this hardness only applies for instances where the prime factorization of $β$ admits large multiplicities of each prime number. We circumvent this necessity proving that the problem remains NP-hard, even if each prime number only occurs constantly often. Then, using this new hardness result for the Quadratic Congruences problem, we prove a lower bound of $2^{2^{δ(s+t)}} |I|^{O(1)}$ for some $δ> 0$ for the running time of any algorithm solving $2$-stage stochastic ILPs assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH). Here, $|I|$ is the encoding length of the instance. This result even holds if $r$, $||b||_{\infty}$, $||c||_{\infty}, ||\ell||_{\infty}$ and the largest absolute value $Δ$ in the constraint matrix $\mathcal{A}$ are constant. This shows that the state-of-the-art algorithms are nearly tight. Further, it proves the suspicion that these ILPs are indeed harder to solve than the closely related $n$-fold ILPs where the contraint matrix is the transpose of $\mathcal A$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

New Bounds for the Vertices of the Integer Hull

The vertices of the integer hull are the integral equivalent to the well-studied basic feasible solutions of linear programs. In this paper we give new bounds on the number of non-zero components -- their support -- of these vertices matching either the best known bounds or improving upon them. While the best known bounds make use of deep techniques, we only use basic results from probability theory to make use of the concentration of measure effect. To show the versatility of our techniques, we use our results to give the best known bounds on the number of such vertices and an algorithm to enumerate them. We also improve upon the known lower bounds to show that our results are nearly optimal. One of the main ingredients of our work is a generalization of the famous Hoeffding bound to vector-valued random variables that might be of general interest.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access