Source author record

Kiran Luecke

Kiran Luecke appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
1topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Completed K-theory and Equivariant Elliptic Cohomology

Kitchloo and Morava give a strikingly simple picture of elliptic cohomology at the Tate curve by studying a completed version of $S^1$-equivariant $K$-theory for spaces. Several authors (cf [ABG],[KM],[L]) have suggested that an equivariant version ought to be related to the work of Freed-Hopkins-Teleman ([FHT1],[FHT2],[FHT3]). However, a first attempt at this runs into apparent contradictions concerning twist, degree, and cup product. Several authors (cf. [BET],[G],[K]) have solved the problem over the complex numbers by interpreting the $S^1$-equivariant parameter as a complex variable and using holomorphicity as the technique for completion. This paper gives a solution that works integrally, by constructing a carefully completed model of $K$-theory for $S^1$-equivariant stacks which allows for certain ``convergent" infinite-dimensional cocycles.

preprint2022arXiv

There aren't that many Morava E-theories

Let $k$ be a perfect field of characteristic $p$. Associated to any (1-dimensional, commutative) formal group law of finite height $n$ over $k$ there is a complex oriented cohomology theory represented by a spectrum denoted $E(n)$ and commonly referred to as Morava $E$-theory. These spectra are known to admit $E_\infty$-structures, and the dependence of the $E_\infty$-structure on the choice of formal group law has been well studied (cf.\ [GH], [R], [L], Section 5, [PV]). In this note we show that the underlying homotopy type of $E(n)$ is independent of the choice of formal group law.