Source author record

Kimberly Presser

Kimberly Presser appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
1topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2012arXiv

A Survey of the Return Times Theorem

The goal of this paper is to survey the history, development and current status of the Return Times Theorem and its many extensions and variations. Let $(X, \mathcal{F}, μ)$ be a finite measure space and let $T:X \rightarrow X$ be a measure preserving transformation. Perhaps the oldest result in ergodic theory is that of Poincaré's Recurrence Principle which states: For any set $A \in \mathcal{F}$, the set of points $x$ of $A$ such that $T^nx$ is not in the set $A$ for all $n > 0$ has zero measure. This says that almost every point of $A$ returns to $A$. In fact, almost every point of $A$ returns to $A$ infinitely often. The return time for a given element $x \in A$, $r_A(x) = \inf\{k \geq 1: T^kx \in A\}$, is the first time that the element $x$ returns to the set $A$. By Poincaré's Recurrence Principle there is set of full measure in $A$ such that all elements of this set have a finite return time. Our study of the Return Times Theorem asks how we can further generalize this notion. The paper begins by looking at early work with the concept of weighted averages. The second portion of the paper focuses on the historical development of the proofs of the Return Times Theorem. Three areas of extension of the Return Times Theorem are then considered: a multiterm version, characteristic factors and breaking the Hölderian duality. The paper concludes with discussion of some more recent work and open questions to consider.