Source author record

Khushnuma Tanveer

Khushnuma Tanveer appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2017arXiv

Comprehensive overview and assessment of miRNA target prediction tools in human and drosophila melanogaster

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNAs that control gene expression at the post-transcriptional level through complementary base pairing with the target mRNA, leading to mRNA degradation and blocking translation process. Any dysfunctions of these small regulatory molecules have been linked with the development and progression of several diseases. Therefore, it is necessary to reliably predict potential miRNA targets. A large number of computational prediction tools have been developed which provide a faster way to find putative miRNA targets, but at the same time their results are often inconsistent. Hence, finding a reliable, functional miRNA target is still a challenging task. Also, each tool is equipped with different algorithms, and it is difficult for the biologists to know which tool is the best choice for their study. This paper briefly describes fundamental of miRNA target prediction algorithms, discuss frequently used prediction tools, and further, the performance of frequently used prediction tools have been assessed using experimentally validated high confident mature miRNAs and their targets for two organisms Human and Drosophila Melanogaster. Both Drosophila Melanogaster and Human supported miRNA target prediction tools have been evaluated separately to find out best performing tool for each of these two organisms. In the human dataset, TargetScan showed the best results amongst the other predictors followed by the miRmap and microT, whereas in the D. Melanogaster dataset, MicroT tool showed the best performance followed by the TargetScan in the comparison of other tools.