Researcher profile

Khubaib Ahmad

Khubaib Ahmad contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 11 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
1works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A Late Fusion Framework with Multiple Optimization Methods for Media Interestingness

The recent advancement in Multimedia Analytical, Computer Vision (CV), and Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms resulted in several interesting tools allowing an automatic analysis and retrieval of multimedia content of users' interests. However, retrieving the content of interest generally involves analysis and extraction of semantic features, such as emotions and interestingness-level. The extraction of such meaningful information is a complex task and generally, the performance of individual algorithms is very low. One way to enhance the performance of the individual algorithms is to combine the predictive capabilities of multiple algorithms using fusion schemes. This allows the individual algorithms to complement each other, leading to improved performance. This paper proposes several fusion methods for the media interestingness score prediction task introduced in CLEF Fusion 2022. The proposed methods include both a naive fusion scheme, where all the inducers are treated equally and a merit-based fusion scheme where multiple weight optimization methods are employed to assign weights to the individual inducers. In total, we used six optimization methods including a Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), a Genetic Algorithm (GA), Nelder Mead, Trust Region Constrained (TRC), and Limited-memory Broyden Fletcher Goldfarb Shanno Algorithm (LBFGSA), and Truncated Newton Algorithm (TNA). Overall better results are obtained with PSO and TNA achieving 0.109 mean average precision at 10. The task is complex and generally, scores are low. We believe the presented analysis will provide a baseline for future research in the domain.