Evaluating the cognitive reality of Spanish irregular morphomic patterns: Humans vs. Transformers
Do transformer models generalize morphological patterns like humans do? We investigate this by directly comparing transformers to human behavioral data on Spanish irregular morphomic patterns from \citet{Nevins2015TheRA}. We adopt the same analytical framework as the original human study. Under controlled input conditions, we evaluate whether transformer models can replicate human-like sensitivity to the morphome, a complex linguistic phenomenon. Our experiments focus on three frequency conditions: natural, low-frequency, and high-frequency distributions of verbs exhibiting irregular morphomic patterns. Transformer models achieve higher stem-accuracy than human participants. However, response preferences diverge: humans consistently favor the "natural" inflection across all items, whereas models preferred the irregular forms, and their choices are modulated by the proportion of irregular verbs present during training. Moreover, models trained on the natural and low-frequency distributions, but not the high-frequency distribution, exhibit sensitivity to phonological similarity between test items and Spanish L-shaped verbs, mirroring a limited aspect of human phonological generalization.