Schemes in Lean
We tell the story of how schemes were formalised in three different ways in the Lean theorem prover.
Researcher profile
Kevin Buzzard
Kevin Buzzard contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.
ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Trust snapshot
Quick read
Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators
Actions
Decide how to stay connected
Identity and collaboration
How to connect with this researcher
Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.
Log in to claimDirect collaboration
Open a focused conversation when the fit is right
Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.
Research graph
See the researcher in context
Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.
Building this graph slice
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Published work
6 published item(s)
preprint2022arXiv
What is the point of computers? A question for pure mathematicians
We discuss the idea that computers might soon help mathematicians to prove theorems in areas where they have not previously been useful. Furthermore we argue that these same computer tools will also help us in the communication and teaching of mathematics.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv
Formalising perfectoid spaces
Perfectoid spaces are sophisticated objects in arithmetic geometry introduced by Peter Scholze in 2012. We formalised enough definitions and theorems in topology, algebra and geometry to define perfectoid spaces in the Lean theorem prover. This experiment confirms that a proof assistant can handle complexity in that direction, which is rather different from formalising a long proof about simple objects. It also confirms that mathematicians with no computer science training can become proficient users of a proof assistant in a relatively short period of time. Finally, we observe that formalising a piece of mathematics that is a trending topic boosts the visibility of proof assistants amongst pure mathematicians.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv
Playing simple loony dots and boxes endgames optimally
We explain a highly efficient algorithm for playing the simplest type of dots and boxes endgame optimally (by which we mean "in such a way so as to maximise the number of boxes that you take"). The algorithm is sufficiently simple that it can be learnt and used in over-the-board games by humans. The types of endgames we solve come up commonly in practice in well-played games on a 5x5 board and were in fact developed by the authors in order to improve their over-the-board play.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv
Potential modularity---a survey
A Spitalfields Day at the Newton Institute was organised on the subject of the recent theorem that any elliptic curve over any totally real field is potentially modular. This article is a survey of the strategy of the proof, together with some history.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv
Explicit reduction modulo $p$ of certain crystalline representations
We use the p-adic local Langlands correspondence for GL_2(Q_p) to explicitly compute the reduction modulo p of crystalline representations of small slope, and give applications to modular forms.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access