Source author record

Keshav Aggarwal

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

4works
1topics
4close collaborators

Published work

4 publications

preprint2026arXiv

Explicit bounds for the graphicality of the prime gap sequence

We establish explicit unconditional results on the graphic properties of the prime gap sequence. Let pnp_n denote the nn-th prime number (with p0=1p_0=1) and PDn=(pℓ−pℓ−1)ℓ=1n\mathrm{PD}_n = (p_\ell - p_{\ell-1})_{\ell=1}^n be the sequence of the first nn prime gaps. Building upon the recent work by Erdős \emph{et al}, which proved the graphic nature of PDn\mathrm{PD}_n for large nn unconditionally, and for all nn under RH, we provide the first explicit unconditional threshold such that: (1) For all n≥exp⁡exp⁡(30.5)n \geq \exp\exp(30.5), PDn\mathrm{PD}_n is graphic. (2) For all n≥exp⁡exp⁡(34.5)n \geq \exp\exp(34.5), every realization GnG_n of PDn\mathrm{PD}_n satisfies that (Gn,pn+1−pn)(G_n, p_{n+1}-p_n) is DPG-graphic. Our proofs utilize a more refined criterion for when a sequence is graphic, and better estimates for the first moment of large prime gaps proven through an explicit zero-free region and explicit zero-density estimate for the Riemann zeta function.

preprint2020arXiv

A new subconvex bound for GL(3)\rm GL(3) LL-functions in the tt-aspect

We revisit Munshi's proof of the tt-aspect subconvex bound for GL(3)\rm GL(3) LL-functions, and we are able to remove the `conductor lowering' trick. This simplification along with a more careful stationary phase analysis allows us to improve Munshi's bound to, L(1/2+it,π)≪π,ε(1+∣t∣)3/4−3/40+ε. L(1/2+it, π) \ll_{π, ε} (1+|t|)^{3/4-3/40+ε}.

preprint2020arXiv

The Burgess bound via a trivial delta method

Let gg be a fixed Hecke cusp form for SL(2,Z)\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{Z}) and χχ be a primitive Dirichlet character of conductor MM. The best known subconvex bound for L(1/2,g⊗χ)L(1/2,g\otimes χ) is of Burgess strength. The bound was proved by a couple of methods: shifted convolution sums and the Petersson/Kuznetsov formula analysis. It is natural to ask what inputs are really needed to prove a Burgess-type bound on GL(2)\rm GL(2). In this paper, we give a new proof of the Burgess-type bounds L(1/2,g⊗χ)≪g,εM1/2−1/8+ε{L(1/2,g\otimes χ)\ll_{g,\varepsilon} M^{1/2-1/8+\varepsilon}} and L(1/2,χ)≪εM1/4−1/16+εL(1/2,χ)\ll_{\varepsilon} M^{1/4-1/16+\varepsilon} that does not require the basic tools of the previous proofs and instead uses a trivial delta method.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.