Source author record

Kathleen Carley

Kathleen Carley appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

cs.CY Social and Information Networks

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works

2topics

2close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2022arXiv

Pro or Anti? A Social Influence Model of Online Stance Flipping

Social influence characterizes the change of an individual's stances in a complex social environment towards a topic. Two factors often govern the influence of stances in an online social network: endogenous influences driven by an individual's innate beliefs through the agent's past stances and exogenous influences formed by social network influence between users. Both endogenous and exogenous influences offer important cues to user susceptibility, thereby enhancing the predictive performance on stance changes or flipping. In this work, we propose a stance flipping prediction problem to identify Twitter agents that are susceptible to stance flipping towards the coronavirus vaccine (i.e., from pro-vaccine to anti-vaccine). Specifically, we design a social influence model where each agent has some fixed innate stance and a conviction of the stance that reflects the resistance to change; agents influence each other through the social network structure.From data collected between April 2020 to May 2021, our model achieves 86\% accuracy in predicting agents that flip stances. Further analysis identifies that agents that flip stances have significantly more neighbors engaging in collective expression of the opposite stance, and 53.7% of the agents that flip stances are bots and bot agents require lesser social influence to flip stances.

preprint2001arXiv

Monopoly Power on the Web - A Preliminary Investigation of Search Engines

E-Commerce challenges traditional approaches to assessing monopolistic practices due to the rapid rate of growth, rapid change in technology, difficulty in assessing market share for information products like web sites, and high degree of interconnectivity and alliance formation among corporations. This paper has provided a fundamental framework that integrates a network and economic perspective to the search engine market. The findings indicate that (1) despite an increasing number of search engines, barriers to entry seem high, largely due to the exponential growth in the number of web sites and the non-scalability of the current search technology and collective switching costs; (2) older search engine sites tend typically to have more features to lock in users. Using standard economic indicators (CR4=58% and HHI=1163), the industry looks close to being plagued by anticompetitive practices. But based on a network adjusted HHI constructed in this paper, its value, 870, suggests that there is less cause for concern. Based on all indicators, it suggests that Yahoo would be a contender. Other possible contenders are MSN and Netscape. On the basis of results to date, some search engines keep increasing their audience reach while others don't. The trend shows that some search engines may dominate the search engine market. We suggest conducting research in the coverage performance of search engines and investigate "information search cost" as a performance indicator of search techniques. In addition, we suggest paying attention to any anticompetitive conduct (e.g. product bundling) that may lesson competition and reduce consumer welfare. The combination of network theory and economic theory to study the search engine market is a particularly powerful approach for E-Commerce.