Source author record

Katarzyna D. Lewandowska

Katarzyna D. Lewandowska appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works
2topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2014arXiv

Subdiffusion--reaction process with $A\longrightarrow B$ reactions versus subdiffusion--reaction process with $A+B\longrightarrow B$ reactions

We consider the subdiffusion-reaction process with reactions of a type A+B\arrow B (in which particles A are assumed to be mobile whereas B - static) in comparison to the subdiffusion-reaction process with A\rightarrow B reactions which was studied by I.M. Sokolov et al. in Phys. Rev. E 73, 031102 (2006). In both processes a rule that reactions can only occur between particles which continue to exist is taken into account. Although in both processes a probability of the vanishing of particle A due to a reaction is independent of both time and space variables (assuming that in the system with the A+B\arrow B reactions, particles B are distributed homogeneously) we show that subdiffusion-reaction equations describing these processes as well as their Greens' functions are qualitatively different. For the subdiffusion process with the A+B\arrow B reactions we consider three models. We base the method considered in this paper on a random walk model in a system with both discrete time and space variables. Then, the system with discrete variables is transformed into a system with continuous variables. Such a method seems to be convenient in analysing subdiffusion-reaction processes with partially absorbing or partially reflecting walls. The reason is that within this method we can determine Greens' functions without a necessity of solving a fractional differential subdiffusion-reaction equation with boundary conditions at the walls. As an example we use the model to find the Greens' functions for a subdiffusive-reaction system (with the reactions mentioned above), which is bounded by a partially absorbing wall. This example shows how the model can be used to analyze the subdiffusion-reaction process in a system with partially absorbing or reflecting thin membranes. Employing a simple phenomenological model, we derive equations related to the reaction parameters used in the considered models.

preprint2012arXiv

First passage time for subdiffusion: The nonextensive entropy approach versus the fractional model

We study the similarities and differences between different models concerning subdiffusion. More particularly, we calculate first passage time (FPT) distributions for subdiffusion, derived from Greens' functions of nonlinear equations obtained from Sharma-Mittal's, Tsallis's and Gauss's nonadditive entropies. Then we compare these with FPT distributions calculated from a fractional model using a subdiffusion equation with a fractional time derivative. All of Greens' functions give us exactly the same standard relation $<(Δx)^2> =2 D_αt^α$ which characterizes subdiffusion ($0<α<1$), but generally FPT's are not equivalent to one another. We will show here that the FPT distribution for the fractional model is asymptotically equal to the Sharma--Mittal model over the long time limit only if in the latter case one of the three parameters describing Sharma--Mittal entropy $r$ depends on $α$, and satisfies the specific equation derived in this paper, whereas the other two models mentioned above give different FTPs with the fractional model. Greens' functions obtained from the Sharma-Mittal and fractional models - for $r$ obtained from this particular equation - are very similar to each other. We will also discuss the interpretation of subdiffusion models based on nonadditive entropies and the possibilities of experimental measurement of subdiffusion models parameters.

preprint2012arXiv

The nonextensive entropy approach versus the stochastic in describing subdiffusion

We have proposed a new stochastic interpretation of the sudiffusion described by the Sharma-Mittal entropy formalism which generates a nonlinear subdiffusion equation with natural order derivatives. We have shown that the solution to the diffusion equation generated by Gauss entropy (which is the particular case of Sharma-Mittal entropy) is the same as the solution of the Fokker-Planck (FP) equation generated by the Langevin generalised equation where the `long memory effect' is taken into account. The external noise which pertubates the subdiffusion coefficient (occuring in the solution of FP equation) according to the formula $D_α\rightarrow D_α/u$ where $u$ is a random variable described by the Gamma distribution, provides us with solutions of equations obtained from Sharma-Mittal entropy. We have also shown that the parameters $q$ and $r$ occuring in Sharma-Mittal entropy are controlled by the parameters $α$ and $<u>$, respectively.