BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Kamal K. Seth

Kamal K. Seth contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
hep-ex

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2014arXiv

First Measurements of Timelike Form Factors of the Hyperons, Lambda0, Sigma0, Sigma+, Xi0, Xi-, and Omega-, and Evidence of Diquark Correlations

Using 805 pb^-1 of e+e- annihilation data taken with the CLEO-c detector at psi(3770), sqrt{s}=3770 MeV, we report the first measurements of the electromagnetic form factors of the Lambda0, Sigma0, Sigma+, Xi0, Xi-, and Omega- hyperons for the large timelike momentum transfer of |Q^2|=14.2 GeV^2. The form factors for the different hyperons are found to vary by nearly a factor two. It is found that |G_M(Lambda0)|=1.66(24) x |G_M(Sigma0)|. The Lambda0 and Sigma0 hyperons have the same uds quark content, but differ in their isospin, and therefore the spin of the $ud$ quark pair. It is suggested that the spatial correlation implied by the singlet spin--isospin configuration in the Lambda0 is an example of strong diquark correlations in the Lambda0, as anticipated by Jaffe and Wilczek. Improved measurements of the branching fractions of psi(2S) -> p pbar and hyperon--antihyperon pairs are also reported.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Is the Exotic Hadron X(3872) a D0 D*0 Molecule: Precision Determination of the Binding Energy of X(3872)

It has been proposed that the recently discovered archetypical &#34;exotic&#34; meson, X(3872), with M(X(3872))=3871.68+-0.17 MeV/c^2, and an extremely narrow width, Gamma(X(3872))<1.2 MeV, is a hadronic molecule of bound D^0 and D^*0 mesons. If true, this would establish a new species of hadrons, distinct from qqbar mesons and qqq baryons. It is put to an important experimental test by making a high precision measurement of the proposed molecule&#39;s binding energy. Using 818 pb-1 of e+e- annihilation data taken with the CLEO-c detector at psi(3770), the decays D0 -> KS K+ K- and D^0(Dbar0) -> K+- pi-+ pi+ pi- have been studied to make the highest precision measurement of D0 mass, M(D0)=1864.851+-0.020+-0.019+-0.054 MeV/c^2, where the first error is statistical, the second error is systematic, and the third error is due to uncertainty in kaon masses, or 1864.851+-0.061 MeV/c^2 with all errors added in quadrature. This leads to M(D0 + D*0)=3871.822+-0.140 MeV/c^2, and the binding energy BE(X(3872)) = M(D0+D*0)-M(X(3872)) = +142+-220 keV. At the 90% confidence level this leads to the conclusion that X(3872) is either unbound by as much as 140 keV, or it is bound by less than 420 keV. If bound, X(3872) has a very large radius; the central value of binding energy corresponds to a radius of 12 fm, and the lower limit to 7 fm, both being uncomfortably large for a molecule.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Phase Difference Between the Electromagnetic and Strong Amplitudes for psi(2S) and J/psi Decays into Pairs of Pseudoscalar Mesons

Using the data for 24.5x10^6 psi(2S) produced in e^+e^- annihilations at sqrt{s}=3686 MeV at the CESR-c e^+e^- collider and 8.6x10^6 J/psi produced in the decay psi(2S)->pi^+pi^-J/psi, the branching fractions for psi(2S) and J/psi decays to pairs of pseudoscalar mesons, pi^+pi^-, K^+K^-, and K_S K_L, have been measured using the CLEO-c detector. We obtain branching fractions Br(psi(2S)->pi^+pi^-)=(7.6+-2.5+-0.6)x10^-6, Br(psi(2S)->K^+K^-)=(74.8+-2.3+-3.9)x10^-6, Br(psi(2S)->K_S K_L)=(52.8+-2.5+-3.4)x10^-6, and Br(J/psi->pi^+pi^-)=(1.47+-0.13+-0.13)x10^-4, Br(J/psi->K^+K^-)=(2.86+-0.09+-0.19)x10^-4, Br(J/psi+-K_S K_L)=(2.62+-0.15+-0.14)x10^-4, where the first errors are statistical and the second errors are systematic. The phase differences between the amplitudes for electromagnetic and strong decays of psi(2S) and J/psi to 0^{-+} pseudoscalar pairs are determined by a Monte Carlo method to be δ(psi(2S)_{PP}=(110.5^{+16.0}_{-9.5})^o and δ(J/psi)_{PP}=(73.5^{+5.0}_{-4.5})^o. The difference between the two is Δδ= δ(psi(2S))_{PP}-δ(J/psi)_{PP} =(37.0^{+16.5}_{-10.5})^o.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

HEAVY QUARKONIA: Recent Results from CLEO

Before it stopped data taking in 2008, CLEO had accumulated a large amount of e+e- data in the bottomonium and charmonium regions. These data have led to valuable contributions in the spectroscopy of both |ccbar> and |bbbar> quarkonia, and their continuing analysis is leading to new physics results. In this presentation I want to describe some of the results obtained since HADRON 2009. More than a dozen papers on spectroscopy have been published since then, and my choice for this time-limited presentation is necessarily a subjective one.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Bottomonium Spectroscopy at CLEO

Results of the latest CLEO contribution to bottomonium spectroscopy is presented, the confirmation of the eta_b(1S0) ground state of bottomonium in the radiative decay Upsilon(3S) -> gamma eta_b. The bottomonium hyperfine splitting is determined to be Delta M_hf(1S) = 68.5+-6.6+-2.0 MeV and the branching fraction B(Upsilon(3S) -> gamma eta_b=(7.1+-1.8+-1.1)x10^-4. These results are in good agreement with those reported by BaBar.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access