BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for researchDiscover
Workspaces
Network
Opportunities
Account
Researcher profile
Kalmer Apinis contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.
Trust snapshot
Actions
Identity and collaboration
Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.
Log in to claimDirect collaboration
Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.
Research graph
Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Published work
While teaching untyped $λ$-calculus to undergraduate students, we were wondering why $α$-equivalence is not directly inductively defined. In this paper, we demonstrate that this is indeed feasible. Specifically, we provide a grounded, inductive definition for $α$-equivalence and show that it conforms to the specification provided in the literature. The work presented in this paper is fully formalized in the Rocq Prover.
Non-trivial analysis problems require posets with infinite ascending and descending chains. In order to compute reasonably precise post-fixpoints of the resulting systems of equations, Cousot and Cousot have suggested accelerated fixpoint iteration by means of widening and narrowing. The strict separation into phases, however, may unnecessarily give up precision that cannot be recovered later, as over-approximated interim results have to be fully propagated through the equation the system. Additionally, classical two-phased approach is not suitable for equation systems with infinitely many unknowns---where demand driven solving must be used. Construction of an intertwined approach must be able to answer when it is safe to apply narrowing---or when widening must be applied. In general, this is a difficult problem. In case the right-hand sides of equations are monotonic, however, we can always apply narrowing whenever we have reached a post-fixpoint for an equation. The assumption of monotonicity, though, is not met in presence of widening. It is also not met by equation systems corresponding to context-sensitive inter-procedural analysis, possibly combining context-sensitive analysis of local information with flow-insensitive analysis of globals. As a remedy, we present a novel operator that combines a given widening operator with a given narrowing operator. We present adapted versions of round-robin as well as of worklist iteration, local and side-effecting solving algorithms for the combined operator and prove that the resulting solvers always return sound results and are guaranteed to terminate for monotonic systems whenever only finitely many unknowns (constraint variables) are encountered. Practical remedies are proposed for termination in the non-monotonic case.