BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

K. Scherer

K. Scherer contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
astro-ph.SRastro-ph.HEastro-ph.GA

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Modelling O-star astrospheres with different relative speeds between the ISM and the star: 2D and 3D MHD model comparison

Context. State of the art simulations of astrospheres are modelled using three-dimensional (3D) magnetohydrodynamics (MHD). An astrospheric interaction of a stellar wind (SW) with its surrounding interstellar medium (ISM) can only generate a bow shock if the speed of the interstellar inflow is higher than the fast magnetosonic speed. Aims. The differences of astrospheres at differing speeds of the ISM inflow are investigated, and the necessity of the third dimension in modelling is evaluated. Methods. The model astrosphere of the runaway O-star $λ$ Cephei is computed in both two- and three-dimensional MHD at four different ISM inflow speeds, one of which is barely faster (superfast) and one of which is slower (subfast) than the fast magnetosonic speed. Results. The two-dimensional (2D) and 3D models of astrospheres with ISM inflow speeds considerably higher than the fast magnetosonic speed are in good agreement. However, in 2D models, where no realistic SW magnetic field can be modelled, the downwind structures of the astrospheres vacillate. Models where hydrodynamic effects are not clearly dominant over the magnetic field show asymmetries, thus necessitating a 3D approach. The physical times of simulations of astrospheres with slow ISM inflows can swiftly exceed the lifetime of the corresponding star. A hitherto unobserved structure has been found downwind of the astrotail in the subfast 3D model.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

MHD-shock structures of astrospheres: $λ$ Cephei-like astrospheres

The interpretation of recent observations of bow shocks around O-stars and the creation of corresponding models require a detailed understanding of the associated (magneto-)hydrodynamic structures. We base our study on three-dimensional numerical magneto-)hydrodynamical models, which are analyzed using the dynamically relevant parameters, in particular, the (magneto)sonic Mach numbers. The analytic Rankine-Hugoniot relation for HD and MHD are compared with those obtained by the numerical model. In that context we also show that the only distance which can be approximately determined is that of the termination shock, if it is a hydrodynamical shock. For MHD shocks the stagnation point does not, in general, lie on the inflow line, which is the line parallel to the inflow vector and passing through the star. Thus an estimate via the Bernoulli equation as in the HD case is, in general, not possible. We also show that in O-star astrospheres, distinct regions exist in which the fast, slow, Alfvénic, and sonic Mach numbers become lower than one, implying sub-slow magnetosonic as well as sub-fast and sub-sonic flows. Nevertheless, the analytic MHD Rankine Hugoniot relations can be used for further studies of turbulence and cosmic ray modulation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Skymaps of observables of three-dimensional MHD astrosphere models

Three-dimensional models of astrospheres have recently become of interest. However, comparisons between these models and observations are non-trivial because of the two-dimensional nature of observations. By projecting selected physical values of three-dimensional models of astrospheres onto the surface of a sphere that is centred on a virtual all-sky observer, these models can be compared to observational data in different observables: the column density, bremsstrahlung flux, rotation measure, H$α$ flux, and synchrotron or cyclotron flux. Projections were calculated by rotating and moving the astrosphere model to the desired position and orientation and by then computing the value of a given patch on the sphere by a modified line-of-sight integration. Contributions to the selected observable made by all model cells that are connected to the patch by the line of sight in question were taken into account. When the model produces a bow shock, a distinct parabolic structure produced by the outer astrosheath can be seen in every observable of the projection, the exact shape depending on the orientations of the line of sight and the stellar motion. Of all four examined astrosphere models, only that of $λ$ Cephei shows fluxes that are higher than current observational thresholds. This is due to the strong stellar wind and interstellar inflow of the $λ$ Cephei model.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access