Source author record

K. S. Sudeep

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

2works
3topics
4close collaborators

Published work

2 publications

preprint2022arXiv

On Oriented Diameter of (n,k)(n, k)-Star Graphs

Assignment of one of the two possible directions to every edge of an undirected graph G=(V,E)G=(V,E) is called an orientation of GG. The resulting directed graph is denoted by G→\overrightarrow{G}. A strong orientation is one in which every vertex is reachable from every other vertex via a directed path. The diameter of G→\overrightarrow{G}, i.e., the maximum distance from one vertex to another, depends on the particular orientation. The minimum diameter among all possible orientations is called the oriented diameter diam→(G)\overrightarrow{\text{diam}}(G) of GG. Let n,kn,k be two integers with 1≤k<n1 \leq k < n. In the realm of interconnection networks of processing elements, an (n,k)(n,k)-star graph Sn,kS_{n,k} offers a topology that circumvents the lack of scalability of nn-star graphs SnS_n. In this paper, we present a strong orientation for Sn,kS_{n,k} that combines approaches suggested by Cheng and Lipman [Journal of Interconnection Networks (2002)] for Sn,kS_{n,k} with the one proposed by Fujita [The First International Symposium on Computing and Networking (CANDAR 2013)] for SnS_n. Next, we propose a distributed routing algorithm for Sn,k→\overrightarrow{S_{n,k}} inspired by an algorithm proposed by Kumar, Rajendraprasad and Sudeep [Discrete Applied Mathematics (2021)] for Sn→\overrightarrow{S_n}. With the aid of both the orientation scheme and the routing algorithm, we show that diam→(Sn,k)≤⌊n+k2⌋+2k+6−δ(n,k)\overrightarrow{\text{diam}}(S_{n,k}) \leq \lfloor \frac{n+k}{2} \rfloor + 2k + 6 - δ(n,k) where δ(n,k)δ(n,k) is a non-negative function. The function δ(n,k)δ(n,k) takes on values 2k−n2k-n, 00, and ⌊n−3k2⌋\left\lfloor \frac{n-3k}{2} \right\rfloor respectively for three disjoint intervals k>n2k>\frac{n}{2}, n3<k≤n2\frac{n}{3} < k \leq \frac{n}{2} and k≤n3k\leq \frac{n}{3}. For every value of nn, kk, our upper bound performs better than all known bounds in literature.

preprint2011arXiv

On the Complexity of Edge Packing and Vertex Packing

This paper studies the computational complexity of the Edge Packing problem and the Vertex Packing problem. The edge packing problem (denoted by EDSˉ\bar{EDS}) and the vertex packing problem (denoted by DSˉ\bar{DS} ) are linear programming duals of the edge dominating set problem and the dominating set problem respectively. It is shown that these two problems are equivalent to the set packing problem with respect to hardness of approximation and parametric complexity. It follows that EDSˉ\bar{EDS} and DSˉ\bar{DS} cannot be approximated asymptotically within a factor of O(N1/2−ε)O(N^{1/2-ε}) for any ε>0ε>0 unless NP=ZPPNP=ZPP where, NN is the number of vertices in the given graph. This is in contrast with the fact that the edge dominating set problem is 2-approximable where as the dominating set problem is known to have an O(log⁡O(\log ∣V∣)|V|) approximation algorithm. It also follows from our proof that EDSˉ\bar{EDS} and DSˉ\bar{DS} are W[1]W[1]-complete.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.