Source author record

K. S. Sudeep

K. S. Sudeep appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

On Oriented Diameter of $(n, k)$-Star Graphs

Assignment of one of the two possible directions to every edge of an undirected graph $G=(V,E)$ is called an orientation of $G$. The resulting directed graph is denoted by $\overrightarrow{G}$. A strong orientation is one in which every vertex is reachable from every other vertex via a directed path. The diameter of $\overrightarrow{G}$, i.e., the maximum distance from one vertex to another, depends on the particular orientation. The minimum diameter among all possible orientations is called the oriented diameter $\overrightarrow{\text{diam}}(G)$ of $G$. Let $n,k$ be two integers with $1 \leq k < n$. In the realm of interconnection networks of processing elements, an $(n,k)$-star graph $S_{n,k}$ offers a topology that circumvents the lack of scalability of $n$-star graphs $S_n$. In this paper, we present a strong orientation for $S_{n,k}$ that combines approaches suggested by Cheng and Lipman [Journal of Interconnection Networks (2002)] for $S_{n,k}$ with the one proposed by Fujita [The First International Symposium on Computing and Networking (CANDAR 2013)] for $S_n$. Next, we propose a distributed routing algorithm for $\overrightarrow{S_{n,k}}$ inspired by an algorithm proposed by Kumar, Rajendraprasad and Sudeep [Discrete Applied Mathematics (2021)] for $\overrightarrow{S_n}$. With the aid of both the orientation scheme and the routing algorithm, we show that $\overrightarrow{\text{diam}}(S_{n,k}) \leq \lfloor \frac{n+k}{2} \rfloor + 2k + 6 - δ(n,k)$ where $δ(n,k)$ is a non-negative function. The function $δ(n,k)$ takes on values $2k-n$, $0$, and $\left\lfloor \frac{n-3k}{2} \right\rfloor$ respectively for three disjoint intervals $k>\frac{n}{2}$, $\frac{n}{3} < k \leq \frac{n}{2}$ and $k\leq \frac{n}{3}$. For every value of $n$, $k$, our upper bound performs better than all known bounds in literature.

preprint2011arXiv

On the Complexity of Edge Packing and Vertex Packing

This paper studies the computational complexity of the Edge Packing problem and the Vertex Packing problem. The edge packing problem (denoted by $\bar{EDS}$) and the vertex packing problem (denoted by $\bar{DS} $) are linear programming duals of the edge dominating set problem and the dominating set problem respectively. It is shown that these two problems are equivalent to the set packing problem with respect to hardness of approximation and parametric complexity. It follows that $\bar{EDS}$ and $\bar{DS}$ cannot be approximated asymptotically within a factor of $O(N^{1/2-ε})$ for any $ε>0$ unless $NP=ZPP$ where, $N$ is the number of vertices in the given graph. This is in contrast with the fact that the edge dominating set problem is 2-approximable where as the dominating set problem is known to have an $O(\log$ $|V|)$ approximation algorithm. It also follows from our proof that $\bar{EDS}$ and $\bar{DS}$ are $W[1]$-complete.