Researcher profile

Jurriaan Gillissen

Jurriaan Gillissen contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 11 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
1works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Constitutive model for shear-thickening suspensions: Predictions for steady shear with superposed transverse oscillations

We recently developed a tensorial constitutive model for dense, shear-thickening particle suspensions that combines rate-independent microstructural evolution with a stress-dependent jamming threshold. This gives a good qualitative account for reversing flows, although it quantitatively over-estimates structural anisotropy [J.~J.~J.~Gillissen {\em et al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 123} (21), 214504 (2019)]. Here we use the model to predict the unjamming effect of superposed transverse oscillations on a steady shear flow in the thickened regime [N.~Y.~C.~Lin {\em et al.}, Proc.~Nat.~Acad.~Sci.~USA {\bf 113}, 10774 (2016)]. The model successfully reproduces the oscillation-mediated viscosity drop observed experimentally. We compare the time-dependent components of the stress and microstructure tensors to discrete-element simulations. Although the model correctly captures the main qualitative behaviour, it generally over-predicts the microstructural anisotropy in steady shear, and it under-predicts the number of particle contacts in oscillating shear. It also does not fully capture the correct variation in phase angle between the transverse component of the microstructure and the shear rate oscillations, as the amplitude of the latter is increased. These discrepancies suggest avenues for future improvements to the model.