BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Jurgen Mifsud

Jurgen Mifsud contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
astro-ph.COgr-qcphysics.data-anastro-ph.GAhep-th

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Neural Network Reconstruction of Late-Time Cosmology and Null Tests

The prospect of nonparametric reconstructions of cosmological parameters from observational data sets has been a popular topic in the literature for a number of years. This has mainly taken the form of a technique based on Gaussian processes but this approach is exposed to several foundational issues ranging from overfitting to kernel consistency problems. In this work, we explore the possibility of using artificial neural networks (ANN) to reconstruct late-time expansion and large scale structure cosmological parameters. We first show how mock data can be used to design an optimal ANN for both parameters, which we then use with real data to infer their respective redshift profiles. We further consider cosmological null tests with the reconstructed data in order to confirm the validity of the concordance model of cosmology, in which we observe a mild deviation with cosmic growth data.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Spatial Curvature in $f(R)$ Gravity

In this work, we consider four $f(R)$ gravity models -- the Hu-Sawicki, Starobinsky, Exponential and Tsujikawa models -- and use a range of cosmological data, together with Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling techniques, to constrain the associated model parameters. Our main aim is to compare the results we get when $Ω_{k,0}$ is treated as a free parameter with their counterparts in a spatially flat scenario. The bounds we obtain for $Ω_{k,0}$ in the former case are compatible with a flat geometry. It appears, however, that a higher value of the Hubble constant $H_0$ allows for more curvature. Indeed, upon including in our analysis a Gaussian likelihood constructed from the local measurement of $H_0$, we find that the results favor an open universe at a little over $1σ$. This is perhaps not statistically significant, but it underlines the important implications of the Hubble tension for the assumptions commonly made about spatial curvature. We note that the late-time deviation of the Hubble parameter from its $Λ$CDM equivalent is comparable across all four models, especially in the non-flat case. When $Ω_{k,0}=0$, the Hu-Sawicki model admits a smaller mean value for $Ω_{\text{cdm},0}h^2$, which increases the said deviation at redshifts higher than unity. We also study the effect of a change in scale by evaluating the growth rate at two different wavenumbers $k_\dagger$. Any changes are, on the whole, negligible, although a smaller $k_\dagger$ does result in a slightly larger average value for the deviation parameter $b$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Constraining Teleparallel Gravity through Gaussian Processes

We apply Gaussian processes (GP) in order to impose constraints on teleparallel gravity and its $f(T)$ extensions. We use available $H(z)$ observations from (i) cosmic chronometers data (CC); (ii) Supernova Type Ia (SN) data from the compressed Pantheon release together with the CANDELS and CLASH Multi-Cycle Treasury programs; and (iii) baryonic acoustic oscillation (BAO) datasets from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. For the involved covariance functions, we consider four widely used choices, namely the square exponential, Cauchy, Matérn and rational quadratic kernels, which are consistent with one another within 1$σ$ confidence levels. Specifically, we use the GP approach to reconstruct a model-independent determination of the Hubble constant $H_0$, for each of these kernels and dataset combinations. These analyses are complemented with three recently announced literature values of $H_0$, namely (i) Riess $H_0^{\rm R} = 74.22 \pm 1.82 \,{\rm km\, s}^{-1} {\rm Mpc}^{-1}$; (ii) H0LiCOW Collaboration $H_0^{\rm HW} = 73.3^{+1.7}_{-1.8} \,{\rm km\, s}^{-1} {\rm Mpc}^{-1}$; and (iii) Carnegie-Chicago Hubble Program $H_0^{\rm TRGB} = 69.8 \pm 1.9 \,{\rm km\, s}^{-1} {\rm Mpc}^{-1}$. Additionally, we investigate the transition redshift between the decelerating and accelerating cosmological phases through the GP reconstructed deceleration parameter. Furthermore, we reconstruct the model-independent evolution of the dark energy equation of state, and finally reconstruct the allowed $f(T)$ functions. As a result, the $Λ$CDM model lies inside the allowed region at 1$σ$ in all the examined kernels and datasets, however a negative slope for $f(T)$ versus $T$ is slightly favored.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Cosmology with the Einstein Telescope: No Slip Gravity Model and Redshift Specifications

The Einstein Telescope and other third generation interferometric detectors of gravitational waves are projected to be operational post $2030$. The cosmological signatures of gravitational waves would undoubtedly shed light on any departure from the current gravitational framework. We here confront a specific modified gravity model, the No Slip Gravity model, with forecast observations of gravitational waves. We compare the predicted constraints on the dark energy equation of state parameters $w_0^{}-w_a^{}$, between the modified gravity model and that of Einstein gravity. We show that the No Slip Gravity model mimics closely the constraints from the standard gravitational theory, and that the cosmological constraints are very similar. The use of spectroscopic redshifts, especially in the low--redshift regime, lead to significant improvements in the inferred parameter constraints. We test how well such a prospective gravitational wave dataset would function at testing such models, and find that there are significant degeneracies between the modified gravity model parameters, and the cosmological parameters that determine the distance, due to the gravitational wave dimming effect of the modified theory.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Endowing $\mathbfΛ$ with a dynamic nature: constraints in a spatially curved Universe

In this study, we consider three dark energy models in which $Λ$ is not constant, but has a dynamic nature that depends on the Hubble parameter $H$ and/or its time derivative $\dot{H}$. We analyze the generalized running vacuum model, for which $Λ(H)=A+BH^2+C\dot{H}$, along with the two models obtained by setting $B$ or $C$ equal to zero. A null value for $C$ yields the classical running vacuum model (RVM), while $B=0$ corresponds to what we term the generalized running vacuum sub-case, or GRVS. Our main aim is to investigate whether these models can accommodate non-zero spatial curvature. To this end, we carry out a Markov Chain Monte Carlo analysis using data for the observables associated with Type-Ia supernovae, cosmic chronometers, the cosmic microwave background and baryon acoustic oscillations, as well as two values for the Hubble constant. Then we include data relating to the growth of large-scale structure (LSS) and repeat the procedure. Our results indicate that taking LSS observations into account helps to tighten constraints and determine a definite sign for the model parameters. In the case of the RVM and GRVS, the addition of growth data results in dynamical vacuum energy being preferred to a cosmological constant at a little over $1σ$. This happens in both the flat and non-flat scenarios -- there are only a few exceptions -- but comes at the cost of an extra parameter which can degrade the performance of the models (as assessed by model selection criteria). Of special relevance is the fact that the inclusion of LSS data appears to increase compatibility with a flat geometry. It also brings the constraints on the Hubble constant closer to the range of values established by \emph{Planck}.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access