BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Julian Maclaren

Julian Maclaren contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
eess.ASeess.IVphysics.med-phSound

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

A dataset and model for auditory scene recognition for hearing devices: AHEAD-DS and OpenYAMNet

Scene recognition is important for hearing devices, however; this is challenging, in part because of the limitations of existing datasets. Datasets often lack public accessibility, completeness, or audiologically relevant labels, hindering systematic comparison of machine learning models. Deploying such models on resource-constrained edge devices presents another challenge.The proposed solution is two-fold, a repack and refinement of several open source datasets to create AHEAD-DS, a dataset designed for auditory scene recognition for hearing devices, and introduce OpenYAMNet, a sound recognition model. AHEAD-DS aims to provide a standardised, publicly available dataset with consistent labels relevant to hearing aids, facilitating model comparison. OpenYAMNet is designed for deployment on edge devices like smartphones connected to hearing devices, such as hearing aids and wireless earphones with hearing aid functionality, serving as a baseline model for sound-based scene recognition. OpenYAMNet achieved a mean average precision of 0.86 and accuracy of 0.93 on the testing set of AHEAD-DS across fourteen categories relevant to auditory scene recognition. Real-time sound-based scene recognition capabilities were demonstrated on edge devices by deploying OpenYAMNet to an Android smartphone. Even with a 2018 Google Pixel 3, a phone with modest specifications, the model processes audio with approximately 50ms of latency to load the model, and an approximate linear increase of 30ms per 1 second of audio. The project website with links to code, data, and models. https://github.com/Australian-Future-Hearing-Initiative

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Improved Segmentation and Detection Sensitivity of Diffusion-Weighted Brain Infarct Lesions with Synthetically Enhanced Deep Learning

Purpose: To compare the segmentation and detection performance of a deep learning model trained on a database of human-labelled clinical diffusion-weighted (DW) stroke lesions to a model trained on the same database enhanced with synthetic DW stroke lesions. Methods: In this institutional review board approved study, a stroke database of 962 cases (mean age 65+/-17 years, 255 males, 449 scans with DW positive stroke lesions) and a normal database of 2,027 patients (mean age 38+/-24 years,1088 females) were obtained. Brain volumes with synthetic DW stroke lesions were produced by warping the relative signal increase of real strokes to normal brain volumes. A generic 3D U-Net was trained on four different databases to generate four different models: (a) 375 neuroradiologist-labeled clinical DW positive stroke cases(CDB);(b) 2,000 synthetic cases(S2DB);(c) CDB+2,000 synthetic cases(CS2DB); or (d) CDB+40,000 synthetic cases(CS40DB). The models were tested on 20%(n=192) of the cases of the stroke database, which were excluded from the training set. Segmentation accuracy was characterized using Dice score and lesion volume of the stroke segmentation, and statistical significance was tested using a paired, two-tailed, Student&#39;s t-test. Detection sensitivity and specificity was compared to three neuroradiologists. Results: The performance of the 3D U-Net model trained on the CS40DB(mean Dice 0.72) was better than models trained on the CS2DB (0.70,P <0.001) or the CDB(0.65,P<0.001). The deep learning model was also more sensitive (91%[89%-93%]) than each of the three human readers(84%[81%-87%],78%[75%-81%],and 79%[76%-82%]), but less specific(75%[72%-78%] vs for the three human readers (96%[94%-97%],92%[90%-94%] and 89%[86%-91%]). Conclusion: Deep learning training for segmentation and detection of DW stroke lesions was significantly improved by enhancing the training set with synthetic lesions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access