Source author record

Julia Knight

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

math.LO

Catalog footprint

Research overview

6works

1topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Is this your work?

Open graph Browse papers

preprint2022arXiv

Free structures and limiting density

Gromov asked what a typical (finitely presented) group looks like, and he suggested a way to make the question precise in terms of limiting density. The typical finitely generated group is known to share some important properties with the non-abelian free groups. We ask Gromov's question more generally, for structures in an arbitrary algebraic variety (in the sense of universal algebra), with presentations of a specific form. We focus on elementary properties. We give examples illustrating different behaviors of the limiting density. Based on the examples, we identify sufficient conditions for the elementary first-order theory of the free structure to match that of the typical structure; i.e., a sentence is true in the free structure iff it has limiting density 1.

preprint2022arXiv

Interpreting a field in its Heisenberg group

We improve on and generalize a 1960 result of Maltsev. For a field $F$ , we denote by $H(F)$ the Heisenberg group with entries in $F$ . Maltsev showed that there is a copy of $F$ defined in $H(F)$ , using existential formulas with an arbitrary non-commuting pair $(u,v)$ as parameters. We show that $F$ is interpreted in $H(F)$ using computable $Σ_1$ formulas with no parameters. We give two proofs. The first is an existence proof, relying on a result of Harrison-Trainor, Melnikov, R. Miller, and Montalbán. This proof allows the possibility that the elements of $F$ are represented by tuples in $H(F)$ of no fixed arity. The second proof is direct, giving explicit finitary existential formulas that define the interpretation, with elements of $F$ represented by triples in $H(F)$ . Looking at what was used to arrive at this parameter-free interpretation of $F$ in $H(F)$ , we give general conditions sufficient to eliminate parameters from interpretations.

preprint2020arXiv

Coding in graphs and linear orderings

There is a Turing computable embedding $Φ$ of directed graphs $A$ in undirected graphs. Moreover, there is a fixed tuple of formulas that give a uniform interpretation; i.e., for all directed graphs $A$ , these formulas interpret $A$ in $Φ(G)$ . It follows that A is Medvedev reducible to $Φ(A)$ uniformly; i.e., there is a fixed Turing operator that serves for all $A$ . We observe that there is a graph $G$ that is not Medvedev reducible to any linear ordering. Hence, $G$ is not effectively interpreted in any linear ordering. Similarly, there is a graph that is not interpreted in any linear ordering using computable $Σ_2$ formulas. Any graph can be interpreted in a linear ordering using computable $Σ_3$ formulas. Friedman and Stanley gave a Turing computable embedding L of directed graphs in linear orderings. We show that there is no fixed tuple of $L_{ω_1,ω}$ formulas that, for all $G$ , interpret the input graph $G$ in the output linear ordering $L(G)$ . Harrison-Trainor and Montalbán have also shown this, by a quite different proof.

preprint2016arXiv

Hanf Number for Scott Sentences of Computable Structures

The Hanf number for a set $S$ of sentences in $L_{ω_1,ω}$ (or some other logic) is the least infinite cardinal $κ$ such that for all $φ\in S$ , if $φ$ has models in all infinite cardinalities less than $κ$ , then it has models of all infinite cardinalities. S-D. Friedman asked what is the Hanf number for Scott sentences of computable structures. We show that the value is $\beth_{ω_1^{CK}}$ . The same argument proves that $\beth_{ω_1^{CK}}$ is the Hanf number for Scott sentences of hyperarithmetical structures.

preprint2014arXiv

Computable structures in generic extensions

In this paper, we investigate connections between structures present in every generic extension of the universe $V$ and computability theory. We introduce the notion of {\em generic Muchnik reducibility} that can be used to to compare the complexity of uncountable structures; we establish basic properties of this reducibility, and study it in the context of {\em generic presentability}, the existence of a copy of the structure in every extension by a given forcing. We show that every forcing notion making $ω_2$ countable generically presents some countable structure with no copy in the ground model; and that every structure generically presentble by a forcing notion that does not make $ω_2$ countable has a copy in the ground model. We also show that any countable structure $\mathcal{A}$ that is generically presentable by a forcing notion not collapsing $ω_1$ has a countable copy in $V$ , as does any structure $\mathcal{B}$ generically Muchnik reducible to a structure $\mathcal{A}$ of cardinality $\aleph_1$ . The former positive result yields a new proof of Harrington's result that counterexamples to Vaught's conjecture have models of power $\aleph_1$ with Scott rank arbitrarily high below $ω_2$ . Finally, we show that a rigid structure with copies in all generic extensions by a given forcing has a copy already in the ground model.

preprint2014arXiv

Representing Scott sets in algebraic settings

We prove that for every Scott set $S$ there are $S$ -saturated real closed fields and models of Presburger arithmetic.

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.