Source author record

Joshua T. Staker

Joshua T. Staker appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
3topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2013arXiv

Excitation spectra from angular momentum projection of Hartree-Fock states and the configuration-interaction shell-model

We make numerical comparison of spectra from angular-momentum projection on Hartree-Fock states with spectra from configuration-interaction nuclear shell-model calculations, all carried out in the same model spaces (in this case the sd, lower pf, and p-sd_5/2 shells) and using the same input Hamiltonians. We find, unsurprisingly, that the low-lying excitation spectra for rotational nuclides are well reproduced, but the spectra for vibrational nuclides, and more generally the complex specta for odd-A and odd-odd nuclides are less well reproduced in detail.

preprint2012arXiv

Many-body approximations for atomic binding energies

We benchmark three standard approximations for the many-body problem -- the Hartree-Fock, projected Hartree-Fock, and random phase approximations -- against full numerical configuration-interaction calculations of the electronic structure of atoms, from Li through to Ne. These configuration-interaction calculations used up to $2 \times 10^8$ uncoupled basis states, equivalent to $ 10^7$ coupled basis states (configuration state functions.) Each method uses exactly the same input, i.e., the same single-particle basis and Coulomb matrix elements, so any differences are strictly due to the approximation itself. Although it consistently overestimates the ground state binding energy, the random phase approximation has the smallest overall errors; furthermore, we suggest it may be useful as a method for efficient optimization of single-particle basis functions.