Source author record

Joshua J. Wallace

Joshua J. Wallace appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
2topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

A Search for Transiting Planets in the Globular Cluster M4 with K2: Candidates and Occurrence Limits

We perform a search for transiting planets in the NASA K2 observations of the globular cluster (GC) M4. This search is sensitive to larger orbital periods ($P\lesssim 35$ days, compared to the previous best of $P\lesssim 16$ days) and, at the shortest periods, smaller planet radii (R$_p\gtrsim0.3$ R$_J$, compared to the previous best of R$_p\gtrsim0.8$ R$_J$) than any previous search for GC planets. Seven planet candidates are presented. An analysis of the systematic noise in our data shows that most, if not all, of these candidates are likely false alarms. We calculate planet occurrence rates assuming our highest significance candidate is a planet and occurrence rate upper limits assuming no detections. We calculate 3$σ$ occurrence rate upper limits of 6.1\% for 0.71-2 R$_J$ planets with 1-36 day periods and 16\% for 0.36-0.71 R$_J$ planets with 1-10 day periods. The occurrence rates from Kepler, TESS, and RV studies of field stars are consistent with both a non-detection of a planet and detection of a single hot Jupiter in our data. Comparing to previous studies of GCs, we are unable to place a more stringent constraint than Gilliland et al. 2000 for the radius-period range they were sensitive to, but do place tighter constraints than both Weldrake et al. 2008 and Nascimbeni et al. 2012 for the large-radius regimes to which they were sensitive.