Source author record

Joshua D. Qualls

Joshua D. Qualls appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

hep-th

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works

1topics

1close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2016arXiv

Lectures on Conformal Field Theory

These lectures notes are based on courses given at National Taiwan University, National Chiao-Tung University, and National Tsing Hua University in the spring term of 2015. Although the course was offered primarily for graduate students, these lecture notes have been prepared for a more general audience. They are intended as an introduction to conformal field theories in various dimensions, with applications related to topics of particular interest: topics include the conformal bootstrap program, boundary conformal field theory, and applications related to the AdS/CFT correspondence. We assume the reader to be familiar with quantum mechanics at the graduate level and to have some basic knowledge of quantum field theory. Familiarity with string theory is not a prerequisite for this lectures, although it can only help.

preprint2016arXiv

Universal Bounds in Even-Spin CFTs

We prove using invariance under the modular $S$- and $ST$-transformations that every unitary two-dimensional conformal field theory (CFT) of only even-spin operators (with no extended chiral algebra and with central charges $c,\tilde{c}>1$) contains a primary operator with dimension $Δ_1$ satisfying $0 < Δ_1 < (c+\tilde{c})/24 + 0.09280...$ After deriving both analytical and numerical bounds, we discuss how to extend our methods to bound higher conformal dimensions before deriving lower and upper bounds on the number of primary operators in a given energy range. Using the AdS$_3$/CFT$_2$ dictionary, the bound on $Δ_1$ proves the lightest massive excitation in appropriate theories of 3D matter and gravity with cosmological constant $Λ< 0$ can be no heavier than $1/(8G_N)+O(\sqrt{-Λ})$; the bounds on the number operators are related via AdS/CFT to the entropy of states in the dual gravitational theory. In the flat-space approximation, the limiting mass is exactly that of the lightest BTZ black hole.

preprint2015arXiv

Universal Bounds on Operator Dimensions in General 2D Conformal Field Theories

We derive a bound on the conformal dimensions of the lightest few states in general unitary 2d conformal field theories with discrete spectra using modular invariance, including CFTs with chiral currents. We derive a bound on the conformal dimensions $Δ_1$ and $Δ_2$ going as $c_{\rm tot}/12 + O(1)$. The bound is of the same form found for CFTs without chiral currents in arXiv:0902.2790 and arXiv:1312.0038. We then prove the inequality $Δ_n \leq c_{\rm tot}/12 + O(1)$ for large $c_{\rm tot}$ and with appropriate restrictions on $n$. Using the AdS$_3$/CFT$_2$ correspondence, our bounds correspond to upper bounds on the masses of the lightest few states and a lower bound on the number of states. We conclude by checking our results against several candidate conformal field theories.

preprint2014arXiv

Bounds on Operator Dimensions in 2D Conformal Field Theories

We extend the work of Hellerman (arxiv:0902.2790) to derive an upper bound on the conformal dimension $Δ_2$ of the next-to-lowest nontrival primary operator in unitary two-dimensional conformal field theories without chiral primary operators. The bound we find is of the same form as found for $Δ_1$: $Δ_2 \leq c_{tot}/12 + O(1)$. We find a similar bound on the conformal dimension $Δ_3$, and present a method for deriving bounds on $Δ_n$ for any $n$, under slightly modified assumptions. For asymptotically large $c_{tot}$ and fixed $n$, we show that $Δ_n \leq \frac{c_{tot}}{12}+O(1)$. We conclude with a brief discussion of the gravitational implications of these results.