Source author record

Joseph Hart

Joseph Hart appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

math.NA math.OC Numerical Analysis Quantitative Methods

Catalog footprint

What is connected

5works

4topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2022arXiv

Hyper-differential sensitivity analysis for nonlinear Bayesian inverse problems

We consider hyper-differential sensitivity analysis (HDSA) of nonlinear Bayesian inverse problems governed by PDEs with infinite-dimensional parameters. In previous works, HDSA has been used to assess the sensitivity of the solution of deterministic inverse problems to additional model uncertainties and also different types of measurement data. In the present work, we extend HDSA to the class of Bayesian inverse problems governed by PDEs. The focus is on assessing the sensitivity of certain key quantities derived from the posterior distribution. Specifically, we focus on analyzing the sensitivity of the MAP point and the Bayes risk and make full use of the information embedded in the Bayesian inverse problem. After establishing our mathematical framework for HDSA of Bayesian inverse problems, we present a detailed computational approach for computing the proposed HDSA indices. We examine the effectiveness of the proposed approach on a model inverse problem governed by a PDE for heat conduction.

preprint2022arXiv

Sensitivity driven experimental design to facilitate control of dynamical systems

Control of nonlinear dynamical systems is a complex and multifaceted process. Essential elements of many engineering systems include high fidelity physics-based modeling, offline trajectory planning, feedback control design, and data acquisition strategies to reduce uncertainties. This article proposes an optimization centric perspective which couples these elements in a cohesive framework. We introduce a novel use of hyper-differential sensitivity analysis to understand the sensitivity of feedback controllers to parametric uncertainty in physics-based models used for trajectory planning. These sensitivities provide a foundation to define an optimal experimental design which seeks to acquire data most relevant in reducing demand on the feedback controller. Our proposed framework is illustrated on the Zermelo navigation problem and a hypersonic trajectory control problem using data from NASA's X-43 hypersonic flight tests.

preprint2020arXiv

Hyper-Differential Sensitivity Analysis of Uncertain Parameters in PDE-Constrained Optimization

Many problems in engineering and sciences require the solution of large scale optimization constrained by partial differential equations (PDEs). Though PDE-constrained optimization is itself challenging, most applications pose additional complexity, namely, uncertain parameters in the PDEs. Uncertainty quantification (UQ) is necessary to characterize, prioritize, and study the influence of these uncertain parameters. Sensitivity analysis, a classical tool in UQ, is frequently used to study the sensitivity of a model to uncertain parameters. In this article, we introduce "hyper-differential sensitivity analysis" which considers the sensitivity of the solution of a PDE-constrained optimization problem to uncertain parameters. Our approach is a goal-oriented analysis which may be viewed as a tool to complement other UQ methods in the service of decision making and robust design. We formally define hyper-differential sensitivity indices and highlight their relationship to the existing optimization and sensitivity analysis literatures. Assuming the presence of low rank structure in the parameter space, computational efficiency is achieved by leveraging a generalized singular value decomposition in conjunction with a randomized solver which converts the computational bottleneck of the algorithm into an embarrassingly parallel loop. Two multi-physics examples, consisting of nonlinear steady state control and transient linear inversion, demonstrate efficient identification of the uncertain parameters which have the greatest influence on the optimal solution.

preprint2020arXiv

Randomized Algorithms for Generalized Singular Value Decomposition with Application to Sensitivity Analysis

The generalized singular value decomposition (GSVD) is a valuable tool that has many applications in computational science. However, computing the GSVD for large-scale problems is challenging. Motivated by applications in hyper-differential sensitivity analysis (HDSA), we propose new randomized algorithms for computing the GSVD which use randomized subspace iteration and weighted QR factorization. Detailed error analysis is given which provides insight into the accuracy of the algorithms and the choice of the algorithmic parameters. We demonstrate the performance of our algorithms on test matrices and a large-scale model problem where HDSA is used to study subsurface flow.

preprint2016arXiv

Classification of syncope through data analytics

Objective: Syncope is a sudden loss of consciousness with loss of postural tone and spontaneous recovery; it is a common condition, albeit one that is challenging to accurately diagnose. Uncertainties about the triggering mechanisms and their underlying pathophysiology have led to various classifications of patients exhibiting this symptom. This study presents a new way to classify syncope types using machine learning. Method: we hypothesize that syncope types can be characterized by analyzing blood pressure and heart rate time series data obtained from the head-up tilt test procedure. By optimizing classification rates, we identify a small number of determining markers which enable data clustering. Results: We apply the proposed method to clinical data from 157 subjects; each subject was identified by an expert as being either healthy or suffering from one of three conditions: cardioinhibitory syncope, vasodepressor syncope and postural orthostatic tachycardia. Clustering confirms the three disease groups and identifies two distinct subgroups within the healthy controls. Conclusion: The proposed method provides evidence to question current syncope classifications; it also offers means to refine them. Significance: Current syncope classifications are not based on pathophysiology and have not led to significant improvements in patient care. It is expected that a more faithful classification will facilitate our understanding of the autonomic system for healthy subjects, which is essential in analyzing pathophysiology of the disease groups.