Source author record

Joseph Harms

Joseph Harms appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Learning-Based Stopping Power Mapping on Dual Energy CT for Proton Radiation Therapy

Purpose: Dual-energy CT (DECT) has been used to derive relative stopping power (RSP) map by obtaining the energy dependence of photon interactions. The DECT-derived RSP maps could potentially be compromised by image noise levels and the severity of artifacts when using physics-based mapping techniques, which would affect subsequent clinical applications. This work presents a noise-robust learning-based method to predict RSP maps from DECT for proton radiation therapy. Methods: The proposed method uses a residual attention cycle-consistent generative adversarial (CycleGAN) network. CycleGAN were used to let the DECT-to-RSP mapping be close to a one-to-one mapping by introducing an inverse RSP-to-DECT mapping. We retrospectively investigated 20 head-and-neck cancer patients with DECT scans in proton radiation therapy simulation. Ground truth RSP values were assigned by calculation based on chemical compositions, and acted as learning targets in the training process for DECT datasets, and were evaluated against results from the proposed method using a leave-one-out cross-validation strategy. Results: The predicted RSP maps showed an average normalized mean square error (NMSE) of 2.83% across the whole body volume, and average mean error (ME) less than 3% in all volumes of interest (VOIs). With additional simulated noise added in DECT datasets, the proposed method still maintained a comparable performance, while the physics-based stoichiometric method suffered degraded inaccuracy from increased noise level. The average differences in DVH metrics for clinical target volumes (CTVs) were less than 0.2 Gy for D95% and Dmax with no statistical significance. Conclusion: These results strongly indicate the high accuracy of RSP maps predicted by our machine-learning-based method and show its potential feasibility for proton treatment planning and dose calculation.