Source author record

Jonathan W. Berry

Jonathan W. Berry appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

physics.soc-ph Data Structures and Algorithms physics.data-an Discrete Mathematics Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing Social and Information Networks

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works

6topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2022arXiv

PGAbB: A Block-Based Graph Processing Framework for Heterogeneous Platforms

Designing flexible graph kernels that can run well on various platforms is a crucial research problem due to the frequent usage of graphs for modeling data and recent architectural advances and variety. In this work, we propose a novel graph processing framework, PGAbB (Parallel Graph Algorithms by Blocks), for modern shared-memory heterogeneous platforms. Our framework implements a block-based programming model. This allows a user to express a graph algorithm using kernels that operate on subgraphs. PGAbB support graph computations that fit in host DRAM but not in GPU device memory, and provides simple but effective scheduling techniques to schedule computations to all available resources in a heterogeneous architecture. We have demonstrated that one can easily implement a diverse set of graph algorithms in our framework by developing five algorithms. Our experimental results show that PGAbB implementations achieve better or competitive performance compared to hand-optimized implementations. Based on our experiments on five graph algorithms and forty-four graphs, in the median, PGAbB achieves 1.6, 1.6, 5.7, 3.4, 4.5, and 2.4 times better performance than GAPBS, Galois, Ligra, LAGraph Galois-GPU, and Gunrock graph processing systems, respectively.

preprint2014arXiv

Why do simple algorithms for triangle enumeration work in the real world?

Listing all triangles is a fundamental graph operation. Triangles can have important interpretations in real-world graphs, especially social and other interaction networks. Despite the lack of provably efficient (linear, or slightly super-linear) worst-case algorithms for this problem, practitioners run simple, efficient heuristics to find all triangles in graphs with millions of vertices. How are these heuristics exploiting the structure of these special graphs to provide major speedups in running time? We study one of the most prevalent algorithms used by practitioners. A trivial algorithm enumerates all paths of length $2$, and checks if each such path is incident to a triangle. A good heuristic is to enumerate only those paths of length $2$ where the middle vertex has the lowest degree. It is easily implemented and is empirically known to give remarkable speedups over the trivial algorithm. We study the behavior of this algorithm over graphs with heavy-tailed degree distributions, a defining feature of real-world graphs. The erased configuration model (ECM) efficiently generates a graph with asymptotically (almost) any desired degree sequence. We show that the expected running time of this algorithm over the distribution of graphs created by the ECM is controlled by the $\ell_{4/3}$-norm of the degree sequence. Norms of the degree sequence are a measure of the heaviness of the tail, and it is precisely this feature that allows non-trivial speedups of simple triangle enumeration algorithms. As a corollary of our main theorem, we prove expected linear-time performance for degree sequences following a power law with exponent $α\geq 7/3$, and non-trivial speedup whenever $α\in (2,3)$.

preprint2009arXiv

Tolerating the Community Detection Resolution Limit with Edge Weighting

Communities of vertices within a giant network such as the World-Wide Web are likely to be vastly smaller than the network itself. However, Fortunato and Barthélemy have proved that modularity maximization algorithms for community detection may fail to resolve communities with fewer than $\sqrt{L/2}$ edges, where $L$ is the number of edges in the entire network. This resolution limit leads modularity maximization algorithms to have notoriously poor accuracy on many real networks. Fortunato and Barthélemy's argument can be extended to networks with weighted edges as well, and we derive this corollary argument. We conclude that weighted modularity algorithms may fail to resolve communities with fewer than $\sqrt{W ε/2}$ total edge weight, where $W$ is the total edge weight in the network and $ε$ is the maximum weight of an inter-community edge. If $ε$ is small, then small communities can be resolved. Given a weighted or unweighted network, we describe how to derive new edge weights in order to achieve a low $ε$, we modify the ``CNM'' community detection algorithm to maximize weighted modularity, and show that the resulting algorithm has greatly improved accuracy. In experiments with an emerging community standard benchmark, we find that our simple CNM variant is competitive with the most accurate community detection methods yet proposed.

preprint2007arXiv

Community Detection via Facility Location

In this paper we apply theoretical and practical results from facility location theory to the problem of community detection in networks. The result is an algorithm that computes bounds on a minimization variant of local modularity. We also define the concept of an edge support and a new measure of the goodness of community structures with respect to this concept. We present preliminary results and note that our methods are massively parallelizable.