Researcher profile

Jonathan P. Coles

Jonathan P. Coles contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

The Hubble constant from eight time-delay galaxy lenses

We present a determination of the Hubble constant from the joint, free-form analysis of 8 strongly, quadruply lensing systems. In the concordance cosmology, we find $H_0 = 71.8^{+3.9}_{-3.3}\,\mathrm{km}\,\mathrm{s}^{-1}\,\mathrm{Mpc}^{-1}$ with a precision of $4.97\%$. This is in agreement with the latest measurements from Supernovae Type Ia and Planck observations of the cosmic microwave background. Our precision is lower compared to these and other recent time-delay cosmography determinations, because our modelling strategies reflect the systematic uncertainties of lensing degeneracies. We furthermore are able to find reasonable lensed image reconstructions by constraining to either value of $H_0$ from local and early Universe measurements. This leads us to conclude that current lensing constraints on $H_0$ are not strong enough to break the "Hubble tension" problem of cosmology.

preprint2020arXiv

An Optimizing Symbolic Algebra Approach for Generating Fast Multipole Method Operators

We have developed a symbolic algebra approach to automatically produce, verify, and optimize computer code for the Fast Multipole Method (FMM) operators. This approach allows for flexibility in choosing a basis set and kernel, and can generate computer code for any expansion order in multiple languages. The procedure is implemented in the publicly available Python program Mosaic. Optimizations performed at the symbolic level through algebraic manipulations significantly reduce the number of mathematical operations compared with a straightforward implementation of the equations. We find that the optimizer is able to eliminate 20-80% of the floating-point operations and for the expansion orders $p \le 10$ it changes the observed scaling properties. We present our approach using three variants of the operators with the Cartesian basis set for the harmonic potential kernel $1/r$, including the use of totally symmetric and traceless multipole tensors.

preprint2020arXiv

Lessons from a blind study of simulated lenses: image reconstructions do not always reproduce true convergence

In the coming years, strong gravitational lens discoveries are expected to increase in frequency by two orders of magnitude. Lens-modelling techniques are being developed to prepare for the coming massive influx of new lens data, and blind tests of lens reconstruction with simulated data are needed for validation. In this paper we present a systematic blind study of a sample of 15 simulated strong gravitational lenses from the EAGLE suite of hydrodynamic simulations. We model these lenses with a free-form technique and evaluate reconstructed mass distributions using criteria based on shape, orientation, and lensed image reconstruction. Especially useful is a lensing analogue of the Roche potential in binary star systems, which we call the $\textit{lensing Roche potential}$. This we introduce in order to factor out the well-known problem of steepness or mass-sheet degeneracy. Einstein radii are on average well recovered with a relative error of ${\sim}5\%$ for quads and ${\sim}25\%$ for doubles; the position angle of ellipticity is on average also reproduced well up to $\pm10^{\circ}$, but the reconstructed mass maps tend to be too round and too shallow. It is also easy to reproduce the lensed images, but optimising on this criterion does not guarantee better reconstruction of the mass distribution.