Researcher profile

Jonathan Barrett

Jonathan Barrett contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A no-go theorem for absolute observed events without inequalities or modal logic

This paper builds on no-go theorems to the effect that quantum theory is inconsistent with observations being absolute; that is, unique and non-relative. Unlike the existing no-go results, the one introduced here is based on a theory-independent absoluteness assumption, and there is no need to assume the validity of standard probability theory or of modal logic. The contradiction is derived by assuming that quantum theory applies in any inertial reference frame; accordingly, the result also illuminates a tension between special relativity and absoluteness.

preprint2021arXiv

Cyclic Quantum Causal Models

Causal reasoning is essential to science, yet quantum theory challenges it. Quantum correlations violating Bell inequalities defy satisfactory causal explanations within the framework of classical causal models. What is more, a theory encompassing quantum systems and gravity is expected to allow causally nonseparable processes featuring operations in indefinite causal order, defying that events be causally ordered at all. The first challenge has been addressed through the recent development of intrinsically quantum causal models, allowing causal explanations of quantum processes -- provided they admit a definite causal order, i.e. have an acyclic causal structure. This work addresses causally nonseparable processes and offers a causal perspective on them through extending quantum causal models to cyclic causal structures. Among other applications of the approach, it is shown that all unitarily extendible bipartite processes are causally separable and that for unitary processes, causal nonseparability and cyclicity of their causal structure are equivalent.

preprint2020arXiv

Certified Quantum Random Numbers from Untrusted Light

A remarkable aspect of quantum theory is that certain measurement outcomes are entirely unpredictable to all possible observers. Such quantum events can be harnessed to generate numbers whose randomness is asserted based upon the underlying physical processes. We formally introduce, design and experimentally demonstrate an ultrafast optical quantum random number generator that uses a totally untrusted photonic source. While considering completely general quantum attacks, we certify and generate in real-time random numbers at a rate of $8.05\,$Gb/s with a rigorous security parameter of $10^{-10}$. Our security proof is entirely composable, thereby allowing the generated randomness to be utilised for arbitrary applications in cryptography and beyond. To our knowledge, this represents the fastest composably secure source of quantum random numbers ever reported.

preprint2019arXiv

Simple Communication Complexity Separation from Quantum State Antidistinguishability

A set of $n$ pure quantum states is called antidististinguishable if there exists an $n$-outcome measurement that never outputs the outcome `$k$' on the $k$-th quantum state. We describe sets of quantum states for which any subset of three states is antidistinguishable and use this to produce a two-player communication task that can be solved with $\log d$ qubits, but requires one-way communication of at least $\log (4/3) (d-1) - 1 \approx 0.415 (d-1) - 1$ classical bits. The advantages of the approach are that the proof is simple and self-contained -- not needing, for example, to rely on hard-to-establish prior results in combinatorics -- and that with slight modifications, non-trivial bounds can be established in any dimension $\geq 3$. The task can be framed in terms of the separated parties solving a relation, and the separation is also robust to multiplicative error in the output probabilities. We show, however, that for this particular task, the separation disappears if two-way classical communication is allowed. Finally, we state a conjecture regarding antidistinguishability of sets of states, and provide some supporting numerical evidence. If the conjecture holds, then there is a two-player communication task that can be solved with $\log d$ qubits, but requires one-way communication of $Ω(d \log d)$ classical bits.