BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Jonas Nitzler

Jonas Nitzler contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2025arXiv

Multi-Physics-Enhanced Bayesian Inverse Analysis: Information Gain from Additional Fields

Inverse analysis, such as model calibration, often suffers from a lack of informative data in complex real-world scenarios. The standard remedy, designing new experimental setups, is often costly and time-consuming, while readily available but seemingly useless data are ignored. This work proposes incorporating such data from additional physical fields into the inverse analysis, even when the forward model solves a single-physics problem. A Bayesian framework easily incorporates the additional data and quantifies the resulting uncertainty reduction. We formally introduce the proposed method, which we denote as multi-physics-enhanced Bayesian inverse analysis. Moreover, this work is the first to quantify the reduction in parameter uncertainty by comparing the information gain from the prior to the posterior when using single-physics versus multi-physics data. We demonstrate the potential of the proposed method in two exemplary applications. Our results show that even a few or noisy data points from an additional physical field can considerably increase the information gain, even when the physical field is only weakly or one-way coupled. Overall, this work proposes and promotes the future use of multi-physics-enhanced Bayesian inverse analysis as a cost- and time-saving game-changer across various fields of science and industry, particularly in medicine.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

A Generalized Probabilistic Learning Approach for Multi-Fidelity Uncertainty Propagation in Complex Physical Simulations

Two of the most significant challenges in uncertainty quantification pertain to the high computational cost for simulating complex physical models and the high dimension of the random inputs. In applications of practical interest, both of these problems are encountered, and standard methods either fail or are not feasible. To overcome the current limitations, we present a generalized formulation of a Bayesian multi-fidelity Monte-Carlo (BMFMC) framework that can exploit lower-fidelity model versions in a small data regime. The goal of our analysis is an efficient and accurate estimation of the complete probabilistic response for high-fidelity models. BMFMC circumvents the curse of dimensionality by learning the relationship between the outputs of a reference high-fidelity model and potentially several lower-fidelity models. While the continuous formulation is mathematically exact and independent of the low-fidelity model's accuracy, we address challenges associated with the small data regime (i.e., only a small number of 50 to 300 high-fidelity model runs can be performed). Specifically, we complement the formulation with a set of informative input features at no extra cost. Despite the inaccurate and noisy information that some low-fidelity models provide, we demonstrate that accurate and certifiable estimates for the quantities of interest can be obtained for uncertainty quantification problems in high stochastic dimensions, with significantly fewer high-fidelity model runs than state-of-the-art methods for uncertainty quantification. We illustrate our approach by applying it to challenging numerical examples such as Navier-Stokes flow simulations and fluid-structure interaction problems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Global sensitivity analysis based on Gaussian-process metamodelling for complex biomechanical problems

Biomechanical models often need to describe very complex systems, organs or diseases, and hence also include a large number of parameters. One of the attractive features of physics-based models is that in those models (most) parameters have a clear physical meaning. Nevertheless, the determination of these parameters is often very elaborate and costly and shows a large scatter within the population. Hence, it is essential to identify the most important parameter for a particular problem at hand. In order to distinguish parameters which have a significant influence on a specific model output from non-influential parameters, we use sensitivity analysis, in particular the Sobol method as a global variance-based method. However, the Sobol method requires a large number of model evaluations, which is prohibitive for computationally expensive models. We therefore employ Gaussian processes as a metamodel for the underlying full model. Metamodelling introduces further uncertainty, which we also quantify. We demonstrate the approach by applying it to two different problems: nanoparticle-mediated drug delivery in a multiphase tumour-growth model, and arterial growth and remodelling. Even relatively small numbers of evaluations of the full model suffice to identify the influential parameters in both cases and to separate them from non-influential parameters. The approach also allows the quantification of higher-order interaction effects. We thus show that a variance-based global sensitivity analysis is feasible for computationally expensive biomechanical models. Different aspects of sensitivity analysis are covered including a transparent declaration of the uncertainties involved in the estimation process. Such a global sensitivity analysis not only helps to massively reduce costs for experimental determination of parameters but is also highly beneficial for inverse analysis of such complex models.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access