BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

John Yen

John Yen appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Artificial Intelligencecs.CYphysics.soc-phSocial and Information Networks

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2013arXiv

Can Evidence Be Combined in the Dempster-Shafer Theory

Dempster's rule of combination has been the most controversial part of the Dempster-Shafer (D-S) theory. In particular, Zadeh has reached a conjecture on the noncombinability of evidence from a relational model of the D-S theory. In this paper, we will describe another relational model where D-S masses are represented as conditional granular distributions. By comparing it with Zadeh's relational model, we will show how Zadeh's conjecture on combinability does not affect the applicability of Dempster's rule in our model.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Generalizing the Dempster-Shafer Theory to Fuzzy Sets

With the desire to apply the Dempster-Shafer theory to complex real world problems where the evidential strength is often imprecise and vague, several attempts have been made to generalize the theory. However, the important concept in the D-S theory that the belief and plausibility functions are lower and upper probabilities is no longer preserved in these generalizations. In this paper, we describe a generalized theory of evidence where the degree of belief in a fuzzy set is obtained by minimizing the probability of the fuzzy set under the constraints imposed by a basic probability assignment. To formulate the probabilistic constraint of a fuzzy focal element, we decompose it into a set of consonant non-fuzzy focal elements. By generalizing the compatibility relation to a possibility theory, we are able to justify our generalization to Dempster's rule based on possibility distribution. Our generalization not only extends the application of the D-S theory but also illustrates a way that probability theory and fuzzy set theory can be combined to deal with different kinds of uncertain information in AI systems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Implementing Evidential Reasoning in Expert Systems

The Dempster-Shafer theory has been extended recently for its application to expert systems. However, implementing the extended D-S reasoning model in rule-based systems greatly complicates the task of generating informative explanations. By implementing GERTIS, a prototype system for diagnosing rheumatoid arthritis, we show that two kinds of knowledge are essential for explanation generation: (l) taxonomic class relationships between hypotheses and (2) pointers to the rules that significantly contribute to belief in the hypothesis. As a result, the knowledge represented in GERTIS is richer and more complex than that of conventional rule-based systems. GERTIS not only demonstrates the feasibility of rule-based evidential-reasoning systems, but also suggests ways to generate better explanations, and to explicitly represent various useful relationships among hypotheses and rules.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Finding influential users of an online health community: a new metric based on sentiment influence

What characterizes influential users in online health communities (OHCs)? We hypothesize that (1) the emotional support received by OHC members can be assessed from their sentiment ex-pressed in online interactions, and (2) such assessments can help to identify influential OHC members. Through text mining and sentiment analysis of users' online interactions, we propose a novel metric that directly measures a user's ability to affect the sentiment of others. Using dataset from an OHC, we demonstrate that this metric is highly effective in identifying influential users. In addition, combining the metric with other traditional measures further improves the identification of influential users. This study can facilitate online community management and advance our understanding of social influence in OHCs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access