Source author record

John T. Baldwin

John T. Baldwin appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

math.LO math.CO Neural and Evolutionary Computing

Catalog footprint

What is connected

8works

3topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2022arXiv

Strongly minimal Steiner Systems III: Path graphs and sparse configurations

We introduce a uniform method of proof for the following results. For {\em each} of the following conditions, there are $2^{\aleph_0}$ families of Steiner systems, satisfying that condition: i) Theorem~2.2.4: (extending \cite{Chicoetal}) each Steiner triple system is $\infty$-sparse and has a uniform but not perfect path graph; ii) (Theorem~5.4.2: (extending \cite{CameronWebb}) each Steiner $k$-system (for $k=p^n$) is $2$-transitive and has a uniform path graph (infinite cycles only); iii) Theorem~2.1.5: (extending \cite{Fujiwaramitre}, each is anti-Pasch (anti-mitre); iv) Theorem~3.6 has an explicit quasi-group structure. In each case all members of the family satisfy the same complete strongly minimal theory and it has $\aleph_0$ countable models and one model of each uncountable cardinal.

preprint2015arXiv

Constructing many atomic models in $\aleph_1$

We introduce the notion of pseudo-algebraicity to study atomic models of first order theories (equivalently models of a complete sentence of $L_{ω_1,ω}$. Theorem: Let $T$ be any complete first-order theory in a countable language with an atomic model. If the pseudo-minimal types are not dense, then there are $2^{\aleph_1}$ pairwise non-isomorphic atomic models of $T$, each of size $\aleph_1$.

preprint2015arXiv

The Joint Embedding Property and Maximal Models

We introduce the notion of a `pure` Abstract Elementary Class to block trivial counterexamples. We study classes of models of bipartite graphs and show: Main Theorem (cf. Theorem 3.5.2 and Corollary 3.5.6): If $(λ_i : i \le α<\aleph_1)$ is a strictly increasing sequence of characterizable cardinals (Definition 2.1) whose models satisfy JEP$(<λ_0)$, there is an $L_{ω_1,ω}$ -sentence $ψ$ whose models form a pure AEC and (1) The models of $ψ$ satisfy JEP$(<λ_0)$, while JEP fails for all larger cardinals and AP fails in all infinite cardinals. (2) There exist $2^{λ_i^+}$ non-isomorphic maximal models of $ψ$ in $λ_i^+$, for all $i \le α$, but no maximal models in any other cardinality; and (3) $ψ$ has arbitrarily large models. In particular this shows the Hanf number for JEP and the Hanf number for maximality for pure AEC with Lowenheim number $\aleph_0$ are at least $\beth_{ω_1}$. We show that although AP$(κ)$ for each $κ$ implies the full amalgamation property, JEP$(κ)$ for each κdoes not imply the full joint embedding property. We show the main combinatorial device of this paper cannot be used to extend the main theorem to a complete sentence.

preprint1998arXiv

On the classifiability of cellular automata

Based on computer simulations Wolfram presented in several papers conjectured classifications of cellular automata into 4 types. He distinguishes the 4 classes of cellular automata by the evolution of the pattern generated by applying a cellular automaton to a finite input. Wolfram's qualitative classification is based on the examination of a large number of simulations. In addition to this classification based on the rate of growth, he conjectured a similar classification according to the eventual pattern. We consider here one formalization of his rate of growth suggestion. After completing our major results (based only on Wolfram's work), we investigated other contributions to the area and we report the relation of some of them to our discoveries.

preprint1996arXiv

DOP and FCP in generic structures

Spencer and Shelah [ShSp:304] constructed for each irrational alpha between 0 and 1 the theory T^alpha as the almost sure theory of random graphs with edge probability n^{- alpha}. In [BlSh:528] we proved that this was the same theory as the theory T_alpha built by constructing a generic model in Baldwin and Shi. In this paper we explore some of the more subtle model theoretic properties of this theory. We show that T^alpha has the dimensional order property and does not have the finite cover property.

preprint1996arXiv

Randomness and semigenericity

Let L contain only the equality symbol and let L^+ be an arbitrary finite symmetric relational language containing L . Suppose probabilities are defined on finite L^+ structures with ''edge probability'' n^{- alpha}. By T^alpha, the almost sure theory of random L^+-structures we mean the collection of L^+-sentences which have limit probability 1. T_alpha denotes the theory of the generic structures for K_alpha, (the collection of finite graphs G with delta_{alpha}(G)=|G|- alpha. | edges of G | hereditarily nonnegative.) THEOREM: T_alpha, the almost sure theory of random L^+-structures is the same as the theory T_alpha of the K_alpha-generic model. This theory is complete, stable, and nearly model complete. Moreover, it has the finite model property and has only infinite models so is not finitely axiomatizable.

preprint1993arXiv

Forcing isomorphism

A forcing extension may create new isomorphisms between two models of a first order theory. Certain model theoretic constraints on the theory and other constraints on the forcing can prevent this pathology. A countable first order theory is classifiable if it is superstable and does not have either the dimensional order property or the omitting types order property. Shelah [Sh:c] showed that if a theory T is classifiable then each model of cardinality lambda is described by a sentence of L_{infty, lambda}. In fact this sentence can be chosen in the L^*_{lambda}. (L^*_{lambda} is the result of enriching the language L_{infty, beth^+} by adding for each mu < lambda a quantifier saying the dimension of a dependence structure is greater than mu .) The truth of such sentences will be preserved by any forcing that does not collapse cardinals <= lambda and that adds no new countable subsets of lambda. Hence, if two models of a classifiable theory of power lambda are non-isomorphic, they are non-isomorphic after a lambda-complete forcing. Here we show that the hypothesis of the forcing adding no new countable subsets of lambda cannot be eliminated. In particular, we show that non-isomorphism of models of a classifiable theory need not be preserved by ccc forcings.

preprint1991arXiv

The primal framework. II. Smoothness

This is the second in a series of articles developing abstract classification theory for classes that have a notion of prime models over independent pairs and over chains. It deals with the problem of smoothness and establishing the existence and uniqueness of a `monster model'. We work here with a predicate for a canonically prime model.