BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

John Lapinskas

John Lapinskas contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Computational ComplexityData Structures and Algorithmsmath.COmath.PRPopulations and EvolutionSocial and Information Networks

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Approximately counting and sampling small witnesses using a colourful decision oracle

In this paper, we design efficient algorithms to approximately count the number of edges of a given $k$-hypergraph, and to sample an approximately uniform random edge. The hypergraph is not given explicitly, and can be accessed only through its colourful independence oracle: The colourful independence oracle returns yes or no depending on whether a given subset of the vertices contains an edge that is colourful with respect to a given vertex-colouring. Our results extend and/or strengthen recent results in the graph oracle literature due to Beame et al. (ITCS 2018), Dell and Lapinskas (STOC 2018), and Bhattacharya et al. (ISAAC 2019). Our results have consequences for approximate counting/sampling: We can turn certain kinds of decision algorithms into approximate counting/sampling algorithms without causing much overhead in the running time. We apply this approximate-counting/sampling-to-decision reduction to key problems in fine-grained complexity (such as $k$-SUM, $k$-OV and weighted $k$-Clique) and parameterised complexity (such as induced subgraphs of size $k$ or weight-$k$ solutions to CSPs).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Stopping explosion by penalising transmission to hubs in scale-free spatial random graphs

We study the spread of information in finite and infinite inhomogeneous spatial random graphs. We assume that each edge has a transmission cost that is a product of an i.i.d. random variable L and a penalty factor: edges between vertices of expected degrees w_1 and w_2 are penalised by a factor of (w_1w_2)^μfor all μ>0. We study this process for scale-free percolation, for (finite and infinite) Geometric Inhomogeneous Random Graphs, and for Hyperbolic Random Graphs, all with power law degree distributions with exponent τ> 1. For τ< 3, we find a threshold behaviour, depending on how fast the cumulative distribution function of L decays at zero. If it decays at most polynomially with exponent smaller than (3-τ)/(2μ) then explosion happens, i.e., with positive probability we can reach infinitely many vertices with finite cost (for the infinite models), or reach a linear fraction of all vertices with bounded costs (for the finite models). On the other hand, if the cdf of L decays at zero at least polynomially with exponent larger than (3-τ)/(2μ), then no explosion happens. This behaviour is arguably a better representation of information spreading processes in social networks than the case without penalising factor, in which explosion always happens unless the cdf of L is doubly exponentially flat around zero. Finally, we extend the results to other penalty functions, including arbitrary polynomials in w_1 and w_2. In some cases the interesting phenomenon occurs that the model changes behaviour (from explosive to conservative and vice versa) when we reverse the role of w_1 and w_2. Intuitively, this could corresponds to reversing the flow of information: gathering information might take much longer than sending it out.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access