Source author record

John E. Laird

John E. Laird appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Artificial Intelligence

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works

1topics

1close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2022arXiv

An Analysis and Comparison of ACT-R and Soar

This is a detailed analysis and comparison of the ACT-R and Soar cognitive architectures, including their overall structure, their representations of agent data and metadata, and their associated processing. It focuses on working memory, procedural memory, and long-term declarative memory. I emphasize the commonalities, which are many, but also highlight the differences. I identify the processes and distinct classes of information used by these architectures, including agent data, metadata, and meta-process data, and explore the roles that metadata play in decision making, memory retrievals, and learning.

preprint2022arXiv

Introduction to Soar

This paper is the recommended initial reading for a functional overview of Soar, version 9.6. It includes an abstract overview of the architectural structure of Soar including its processing, memories, learning modules, their interfaces, and the representations of knowledge used by those modules. From there it describes the processing supported by those modules, including decision making, impasses and substates, procedure learning via chunking, reinforcement learning, semantic memory, episodic memory, and spatial-visual reasoning. It then reviews the levels of decision making and variety of learning in Soar, and analysis of Soar as an architecture supporting general human-level AI. Following the references is an appendix that contains short descriptions of recent Soar agents and a glossary of the terminology we use in describing Soar.

preprint2012arXiv

Relational Reinforcement Learning in Infinite Mario

Relational representations in reinforcement learning allow for the use of structural information like the presence of objects and relationships between them in the description of value functions. Through this paper, we show that such representations allow for the inclusion of background knowledge that qualitatively describes a state and can be used to design agents that demonstrate learning behavior in domains with large state and actions spaces such as computer games.