BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Johannes Lengler

Johannes Lengler appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Neural and Evolutionary Computingmath.PRmath.COData Structures and AlgorithmsSocial and Information NetworksComputational Complexitymath.NTPopulations and Evolution

Catalog footprint

What is connected

11works
8topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

11 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Population Diversity Leads to Short Running Times of Lexicase Selection

In this paper we investigate why the running time of lexicase parent selection is empirically much lower than its worst-case bound of O(N*C). We define a measure of population diversity and prove that high diversity leads to low running times O(N + C) of lexicase selection. We then show empirically that genetic programming populations evolved under lexicase selection are diverse for several program synthesis problems, and explore the resulting differences in running time bounds.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Bootstrap percolation on geometric inhomogeneous random graphs

Geometric inhomogeneous random graphs (GIRGs) are a model for scale-free networks with underlying geometry. We study bootstrap percolation on these graphs, which is a process modelling the spread of an infection of vertices starting within a (small) local region. We show that the process exhibits a phase transition in terms of the initial infection rate in this region. We determine the speed of the process in the supercritical case, up to lower order terms, and show that its evolution is fundamentally influenced by the underlying geometry. For vertices with given position and expected degree, we determine the infection time up to lower order terms. Finally, we show how this knowledge can be used to contain the infection locally by removing relatively few edges from the graph. This is the first time that the role of geometry on bootstrap percolation is analysed mathematically for geometric scale-free networks.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Large Population Sizes and Crossover Help in Dynamic Environments

Dynamic linear functions on the hypercube are functions which assign to each bit a positive weight, but the weights change over time. Throughout optimization, these functions maintain the same global optimum, and never have defecting local optima. Nevertheless, it was recently shown [Lengler, Schaller, FOCI 2019] that the $(1+1)$-Evolutionary Algorithm needs exponential time to find or approximate the optimum for some algorithm configurations. In this paper, we study the effect of larger population sizes for Dynamic BinVal, the extremal form of dynamic linear functions. We find that moderately increased population sizes extend the range of efficient algorithm configurations, and that crossover boosts this positive effect substantially. Remarkably, similar to the static setting of monotone functions in [Lengler, Zou, FOGA 2019], the hardest region of optimization for $(μ+1)$-EA is not close the optimum, but far away from it. In contrast, for the $(μ+1)$-GA, the region around the optimum is the hardest region in all studied cases.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Stopping explosion by penalising transmission to hubs in scale-free spatial random graphs

We study the spread of information in finite and infinite inhomogeneous spatial random graphs. We assume that each edge has a transmission cost that is a product of an i.i.d. random variable L and a penalty factor: edges between vertices of expected degrees w_1 and w_2 are penalised by a factor of (w_1w_2)^μfor all μ>0. We study this process for scale-free percolation, for (finite and infinite) Geometric Inhomogeneous Random Graphs, and for Hyperbolic Random Graphs, all with power law degree distributions with exponent τ> 1. For τ< 3, we find a threshold behaviour, depending on how fast the cumulative distribution function of L decays at zero. If it decays at most polynomially with exponent smaller than (3-τ)/(2μ) then explosion happens, i.e., with positive probability we can reach infinitely many vertices with finite cost (for the infinite models), or reach a linear fraction of all vertices with bounded costs (for the finite models). On the other hand, if the cdf of L decays at zero at least polynomially with exponent larger than (3-τ)/(2μ), then no explosion happens. This behaviour is arguably a better representation of information spreading processes in social networks than the case without penalising factor, in which explosion always happens unless the cdf of L is doubly exponentially flat around zero. Finally, we extend the results to other penalty functions, including arbitrary polynomials in w_1 and w_2. In some cases the interesting phenomenon occurs that the model changes behaviour (from explosive to conservative and vice versa) when we reverse the role of w_1 and w_2. Intuitively, this could corresponds to reversing the flow of information: gathering information might take much longer than sending it out.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

The (1+1) Elitist Black-Box Complexity of LeadingOnes

One important goal of black-box complexity theory is the development of complexity models allowing to derive meaningful lower bounds for whole classes of randomized search heuristics. Complementing classical runtime analysis, black-box models help us understand how algorithmic choices such as the population size, the variation operators, or the selection rules influence the optimization time. One example for such a result is the $Ω(n \log n)$ lower bound for unary unbiased algorithms on functions with a unique global optimum [Lehre/Witt, GECCO 2010], which tells us that higher arity operators or biased sampling strategies are needed when trying to beat this bound. In lack of analyzing techniques, almost no non-trivial bounds are known for other restricted models. Proving such bounds therefore remains to be one of the main challenges in black-box complexity theory. With this paper we contribute to our technical toolbox for lower bound computations by proposing a new type of information-theoretic argument. We regard the permutation- and bit-invariant version of \textsc{LeadingOnes} and prove that its (1+1) elitist black-box complexity is $Ω(n^2)$, a bound that is matched by (1+1)-type evolutionary algorithms. The (1+1) elitist complexity of \textsc{LeadingOnes} is thus considerably larger than its unrestricted one, which is known to be of order $n\log\log n$ [Afshani et al., 2013].

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Bootstrap percolation with inhibition

Bootstrap percolation is a prominent framework for studying the spreading of activity on a graph. We begin with an initial set of active vertices. The process then proceeds in rounds, and further vertices become active as soon as they have a certain number of active neighbors. A recurring feature in bootstrap percolation theory is an `all-or-nothing' phenomenon: either the size of the starting set is so small that the process stops very soon, or it percolates (almost) completely. Motivated by several important phenomena observed in various types of real-world networks we propose in this work a variant of bootstrap percolation that exhibits a vastly different behavior. Our graphs have two types of vertices: some of them obstruct the diffusion, while the others facilitate it. We study the effect of this setting by analyzing the process on Erdős-Rényi random graphs. Our main findings are two-fold. First we show that the presence of vertices hindering the diffusion does not result in a stable behavior: tiny changes in the size of the starting set can dramatically influence the size of the final active set. In particular, the process is non-monotone: a larger starting set can result in a smaller final set. In the second part of the paper we show that this phenomenom arises from the round-based approach: if we move to a continuous time model in which every edge draws its transmission time randomly, then we gain stability, and the process stops with an active set that contains a non-trivial constant fraction of all vertices. Moreover, we show that in the continuous time model percolation occurs significantly faster compared to the classical round-based model. Our findings are in line with empirical observations and demonstrate the importance of introducing various types of vertex behaviors in the mathematical model.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Introducing Elitist Black-Box Models: When Does Elitist Selection Weaken the Performance of Evolutionary Algorithms?

Black-box complexity theory provides lower bounds for the runtime of black-box optimizers like evolutionary algorithms and serves as an inspiration for the design of new genetic algorithms. Several black-box models covering different classes of algorithms exist, each highlighting a different aspect of the algorithms under considerations. In this work we add to the existing black-box notions a new \emph{elitist black-box model}, in which algorithms are required to base all decisions solely on (a fixed number of) the best search points sampled so far. Our model combines features of the ranking-based and the memory-restricted black-box models with elitist selection. We provide several examples for which the elitist black-box complexity is exponentially larger than that the respective complexities in all previous black-box models, thus showing that the elitist black-box complexity can be much closer to the runtime of typical evolutionary algorithms. We also introduce the concept of $p$-Monte Carlo black-box complexity, which measures the time it takes to optimize a problem with failure probability at most $p$. Even for small~$p$, the $p$-Monte Carlo black-box complexity of a function class $\mathcal F$ can be smaller by an exponential factor than its typically regarded Las Vegas complexity (which measures the \emph{expected} time it takes to optimize $\mathcal F$).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

OneMax in Black-Box Models with Several Restrictions

Black-box complexity studies lower bounds for the efficiency of general-purpose black-box optimization algorithms such as evolutionary algorithms and other search heuristics. Different models exist, each one being designed to analyze a different aspect of typical heuristics such as the memory size or the variation operators in use. While most of the previous works focus on one particular such aspect, we consider in this work how the combination of several algorithmic restrictions influence the black-box complexity. Our testbed are so-called OneMax functions, a classical set of test functions that is intimately related to classic coin-weighing problems and to the board game Mastermind. We analyze in particular the combined memory-restricted ranking-based black-box complexity of OneMax for different memory sizes. While its isolated memory-restricted as well as its ranking-based black-box complexity for bit strings of length $n$ is only of order $n/\log n$, the combined model does not allow for algorithms being faster than linear in $n$, as can be seen by standard information-theoretic considerations. We show that this linear bound is indeed asymptotically tight. Similar results are obtained for other memory- and offspring-sizes. Our results also apply to the (Monte Carlo) complexity of OneMax in the recently introduced elitist model, in which only the best-so-far solution can be kept in the memory. Finally, we also provide improved lower bounds for the complexity of OneMax in the regarded models. Our result enlivens the quest for natural evolutionary algorithms optimizing OneMax in $o(n \log n)$ iterations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Connectivity Thresholds for Bounded Size Rules

In an Achlioptas process, starting with a graph that has n vertices and no edge, in each round $d \geq 1$ edges are drawn uniformly at random, and using some rule exactly one of them is chosen and added to the evolving graph. For the class of Achlioptas processes we investigate how much impact the rule has on one of the most basic properties of a graph: connectivity. Our main results are twofold. First, we study the prominent class of bounded size rules, which select the edge to add according to the component sizes of its vertices, treating all sizes larger than some constant equally. For such rules we provide a fine analysis that exposes the limiting distribution of the number of rounds until the graph gets connected, and we give a detailed picture of the dynamics of the formation of the single component from smaller components. Second, our results allow us to study the connectivity transition of all Achlioptas processes, in the sense that we identify a process that accelerates it as much as possible.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Black-Box Complexities of Combinatorial Problems

Black-box complexity is a complexity theoretic measure for how difficult a problem is to be optimized by a general purpose optimization algorithm. It is thus one of the few means trying to understand which problems are tractable for genetic algorithms and other randomized search heuristics. Most previous work on black-box complexity is on artificial test functions. In this paper, we move a step forward and give a detailed analysis for the two combinatorial problems minimum spanning tree and single-source shortest paths. Besides giving interesting bounds for their black-box complexities, our work reveals that the choice of how to model the optimization problem is non-trivial here. This in particular comes true where the search space does not consist of bit strings and where a reasonable definition of unbiasedness has to be agreed on.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

The Global Cohen-Lenstra Heuristic

The Cohen-Lenstra heuristic is a universal principle that assigns to each group a probability that tells how often this group should occur "in nature". The most important, but not the only, applications are sequences of class groups, which behave like random sequences of groups with respect to the so-called Cohen-Lenstra probability measure. So far, it was only possible to define this probability measure for finite abelian $p$-groups. We prove that it is also possible to define an analogous probability measure on the set of \emph{all} finite abelian groups when restricting to the $Σ$-algebra on the set of all finite abelian groups that is generated by uniform properties, thereby solving a problem that was open since 1984.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access