BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Johann Schaible

Johann Schaible appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Information Retrievalphysics.soc-phcs.CYDatabasesDigital LibrariesMultiagent SystemsSocial and Information Networks

Catalog footprint

What is connected

5works
7topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Combining sensors and surveys to study social contexts: Case of scientific conferences

In this paper, we present a unique collection of four data sets to study social behaviour. The data were collected at four international scientific conferences, during which we measured face-to-face contacts along with additional information about individuals. Building on innovative methods developed in the last decade to study human social behaviour, interactions between participants were monitored using the SocioPatterns platform, which allows collecting face-to-face physical proximity events every 20 seconds in a well-defined social context. Through accompanying surveys, we gathered extensive information about the participants, including sociodemographic characteristics, Big Five personality traits, DIAMONDS situational perceptions, measure of scientific attractiveness, motivations for attending the conferences, and perceptions of the crowd (e.g., in terms of gender distribution). Linking the sensor and survey data provides a rich window into social behaviour: At the individual level, the data sets allow personality scientists to investigate individual differences in social behaviour and pinpoint which individual characteristics (e.g., social roles, personality traits, situational perceptions) drive these individual differences. At the group level, the data also allow studying the mechanisms responsible for interacting patterns within a scientific crowd during a social, networking and idea-sharing event. The data are available for secondary analysis.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Group mixing drives inequality in face-to-face gatherings

Uncovering how inequality emerges from human interaction is imperative for just societies. Here we show that the way social groups interact in face-to-face situations can enable the emergence of disparities in the visibility of social groups. These disparities translate into members of specific social groups having fewer social ties than the average (i.e., degree inequality). We characterize group degree inequality in sensor-based data sets and present a mechanism that explains these disparities as the result of group mixing and group-size imbalance. We investigate how group sizes affect this inequality, thereby uncovering the critical size and mixing conditions in that a critical minority group emerges. If a minority group is larger than this critical size, it can be a well-connected, cohesive group; if it is smaller, minority cohesion widens degree inequality. Finally, we expose the under-representation of individuals in degree rankings due to mixing dynamics and propose a way to reduce such biases.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Overview of LiLAS 2021 -- Living Labs for Academic Search

The Living Labs for Academic Search (LiLAS) lab aims to strengthen the concept of user-centric living labs for academic search. The methodological gap between real-world and lab-based evaluation should be bridged by allowing lab participants to evaluate their retrieval approaches in two real-world academic search systems from life sciences and social sciences. This overview paper outlines the two academic search systems LIVIVO and GESIS Search, and their corresponding tasks within LiLAS, which are ad-hoc retrieval and dataset recommendation. The lab is based on a new evaluation infrastructure named STELLA that allows participants to submit results corresponding to their experimental systems in the form of pre-computed runs and Docker containers that can be integrated into production systems and generate experimental results in real-time. Both submission types are interleaved with the results provided by the productive systems allowing for a seamless presentation and evaluation. The evaluation of results and a meta-analysis of the different tasks and submission types complement this overview.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

TermPicker: Enabling the Reuse of Vocabulary Terms by Exploiting Data from the Linked Open Data Cloud - An Extended Technical Report

Deciding which vocabulary terms to use when modeling data as Linked Open Data (LOD) is far from trivial. Choosing too general vocabulary terms, or terms from vocabularies that are not used by other LOD datasets, is likely to lead to a data representation, which will be harder to understand by humans and to be consumed by Linked data applications. In this technical report, we propose TermPicker: a novel approach for vocabulary reuse by recommending RDF types and properties based on exploiting the information on how other data providers on the LOD cloud use RDF types and properties to describe their data. To this end, we introduce the notion of so-called schema-level patterns (SLPs). They capture how sets of RDF types are connected via sets of properties within some data collection, e.g., within a dataset on the LOD cloud. TermPicker uses such SLPs and generates a ranked list of vocabulary terms for reuse. The lists of recommended terms are ordered by a ranking model which is computed using the machine learning approach Learning To Rank (L2R). TermPicker is evaluated based on the recommendation quality that is measured using the Mean Average Precision (MAP) and the Mean Reciprocal Rank at the first five positions (MRR@5). Our results illustrate an improvement of the recommendation quality by 29% - 36% when using SLPs compared to the beforehand investigated baselines of recommending solely popular vocabulary terms or terms from the same vocabulary. The overall best results are achieved using SLPs in conjunction with the Learning To Rank algorithm Random Forests.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Discovering Links for Metadata Enrichment on Computer Science Papers

At the very beginning of compiling a bibliography, usually only basic information, such as title, authors and publication date of an item are known. In order to gather additional information about a specific item, one typically has to search the library catalog or use a web search engine. This look-up procedure implies a manual effort for every single item of a bibliography. In this technical report we present a proof of concept which utilizes Linked Data technology for the simple enrichment of sparse metadata sets. This is done by discovering owl:sameAs links be- tween an initial set of computer science papers and resources from external data sources like DBLP, ACM and the Semantic Web Conference Corpus. In this report, we demonstrate how the link discovery tool Silk is used to detect additional information and to enrich an initial set of records in the computer science domain. The pros and cons of silk as link discovery tool are summarized in the end.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access