Source author record

Johan Sivertsen

Johan Sivertsen appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

The space complexity of inner product filters

Motivated by the problem of filtering candidate pairs in inner product similarity joins we study the following inner product estimation problem: Given parameters $d\in {\bf N}$, $α>β\geq 0$ and unit vectors $x,y\in {\bf R}^{d}$ consider the task of distinguishing between the cases $\langle x, y\rangle\leqβ$ and $\langle x, y\rangle\geq α$ where $\langle x, y\rangle = \sum_{i=1}^d x_i y_i$ is the inner product of vectors $x$ and $y$. The goal is to distinguish these cases based on information on each vector encoded independently in a bit string of the shortest length possible. In contrast to much work on compressing vectors using randomized dimensionality reduction, we seek to solve the problem deterministically, with no probability of error. Inner product estimation can be solved in general via estimating $\langle x, y\rangle$ with an additive error bounded by $\varepsilon = α- β$. We show that $d \log_2 \left(\tfrac{\sqrt{1-β}}{\varepsilon}\right) \pm Θ(d)$ bits of information about each vector is necessary and sufficient. Our upper bound is constructive and improves a known upper bound of $d \log_2(1/\varepsilon) + O(d)$ by up to a factor of 2 when $β$ is close to $1$. The lower bound holds even in a stronger model where one of the vectors is known exactly, and an arbitrary estimation function is allowed.

preprint2016arXiv

Approximate Furthest Neighbor with Application to Annulus Query

Much recent work has been devoted to approximate nearest neighbor queries. Motivated by applications in recommender systems, we consider approximate furthest neighbor (AFN) queries and present a simple, fast, and highly practical data structure for answering AFN queries in high- dimensional Euclidean space. The method builds on the technique of In- dyk (SODA 2003), storing random projections to provide sublinear query time for AFN. However, we introduce a different query algorithm, improving on Indyk's approximation factor and reducing the running time by a logarithmic factor. We also present a variation based on a query- independent ordering of the database points; while this does not have the provable approximation factor of the query-dependent data structure, it offers significant improvement in time and space complexity. We give a theoretical analysis, and experimental results. As an application, the query-dependent approach is used for deriving a data structure for the approximate annulus query problem, which is defined as follows: given an input set S and two parameters r > 0 and w >= 1, construct a data structure that returns for each query point q a point p in S such that the distance between p and q is at least r/w and at most wr.

preprint2016arXiv

Distance Sensitive Bloom Filters Without False Negatives

A Bloom filter is a widely used data-structure for representing a set $S$ and answering queries of the form "Is $x$ in $S$?". By allowing some false positive answers (saying "yes" when the answer is in fact `no') Bloom filters use space significantly below what is required for storing $S$. In the distance sensitive setting we work with a set $S$ of (Hamming) vectors and seek a data structure that offers a similar trade-off, but answers queries of the form "Is $x$ close to an element of $S$?" (in Hamming distance). Previous work on distance sensitive Bloom filters have accepted false positive and false negative answers. Absence of false negatives is of critical importance in many applications of Bloom filters, so it is natural to ask if this can be also achieved in the distance sensitive setting. Our main contributions are upper and lower bounds (that are tight in several cases) for space usage in the distance sensitive setting where false negatives are not allowed.