Source author record

Joe Kennedy

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

3works
3topics
4close collaborators

Published work

3 publications

preprint2022arXiv

Seeking New Physics in Cosmology with Bayesian Neural Networks: Dark Energy and Modified Gravity

We study the potential of Bayesian Neural Networks (BNNs) to detect new physics in the dark matter power spectrum, concentrating here on evolving dark energy and modifications to General Relativity. After introducing a new technique to quantify classification uncertainty in BNNs, we train two BNNs on mock matter power spectra produced using the publicly available code ReACT\tt{ReACT} in the kk-range (0.01−2.5) hMpc−1\left(0.01 - 2.5\right) \, h \mathrm{Mpc}^{-1} and redshift bins (0.1,0.478,0.783,1.5)\left(0.1,0.478,0.783,1.5\right) with Euclid-like noise. The first network classifies spectra into five labels including ΛΛCDM, f(R)f(R), wwCDM, Dvali-Gabadaze-Porrati (DGP) gravity and a "random" class whereas the second is trained to distinguish ΛΛCDM from non-ΛΛCDM. Both networks achieve a comparable training, validation and test accuracy of ∼95%\sim 95\%. Each network is also capable of detecting deviations from ΛΛCDM that were not included in the training set, demonstrated with spectra generated using the growth-index γγ. We then quantify the constraining power of each network by computing the smallest deviation from ΛΛCDM such that the noise-averaged non-ΛΛCDM classification probability is at least 2σ2σ, finding these bounds to be fR0≲10−7f_{R0} \lesssim 10^{-7}, Ωrc≲10−2Ω_{rc} \lesssim 10^{-2} , −1.05≲w0≲0.95-1.05 \lesssim w_0 \lesssim 0.95 , −0.2≲wa≲0.2-0.2 \lesssim w_a \lesssim 0.2 , 0.52≲γ≲0.590.52 \lesssim γ\lesssim 0.59 . The bounds on f(R)f(R) can be improved by training a specialist network to distinguish solely between ΛΛCDM and f(R)f(R) power spectra which can detect a non-zero fR0f_{R0} at O(10−8)\mathcal{O}\left(10^{-8}\right) with a confidence >2σ>2σ. We expect that further developments, such as the inclusion of smaller length scales or additional extensions to ΛΛCDM, will only improve the potential of BNNs to detect new physics using cosmological datasets.

preprint2021arXiv

Parameterised post-Newtonian formalism for the effective field theory of dark energy via screened reconstructed Horndeski theories

We bring together two popular formalisms which generically parameterise deviations from General Relativity on astrophysical and cosmological scales, namely the parameterised post-Newtonian (PPN) formalism and the effective field theory (EFT) of dark energy and modified gravity. These separate formalisms are successfully applied to independently perform tests of gravity in their respective regimes of applicability on vastly different length scales. Nonlinear screening mechanisms indeed make it imperative to probe General Relativity across a wide range of scales. For a comprehensive interpretation of the complementary measurements it is important to connect them to effectively constrain the vast gravitational model space. We establish such a connection within the framework of Horndeski scalar-tensor theories restricted to a luminal propagation speed of gravitational waves. This is possible via the reconstruction of the family of linearly degenerate covariant Horndeski actions from the set of EFT functions and the subsequent derivation of the PPN parameters from the reconstructed theory. We outline the required conditions which ensure a reconstructed Horndeski model possesses a screening mechanism that enables significant modifications on cosmological scales while respecting stringent astrophysical bounds. Employing a scaling method, we then perform the general post-Newtonian expansion of the reconstructed models to derive their PPN parameters γγ and ββ in their screened regimes.

preprint2020arXiv

Positivity bounds on reconstructed Horndeski models

Positivity bounds provide conditions that a consistent UV-completion exists for a quantum field theory. We examine their application to Horndeski gravity models reconstructed from the effective field theory (EFT) of dark energy. This enables us to assess whether particular phenomenological parameterizations of the EFT functions reconstruct theories that respect or violate the positivity bounds. We find that commonly adopted EFT parametrizations, cast in terms of the dark energy density or power laws of the scale factor, only satisfy the positivity bounds in non-trivial regions of the parameter space. We then examine parameterizations of the inherently stable EFT basis, constructed to avoid gradient and ghost instabilities by default. In stark contrast, in this basis the positivity bounds either only provide constraints in a-priori unrealistic regions of the parameter space or do not provide any constraints on parameter values at all. The application of positivity bounds to common parametrizations of the standard EFT functions can therefore lead to artificial conclusions that the region of viable Horndeski modifications of gravity is highly constrained. Our results provide a strong motivation, in addition to the default avoidance of theoretical instabilities, for instead adopting parametrizations of the inherently stable EFT basis when testing dark energy and modified gravity models with forthcoming cosmological survey data.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.