Researcher profile

Jing-Yao Li

Jing-Yao Li contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Modeling the Multi-band Light Curves of the Afterglows of Three Gamma-Ray Bursts and Their Associated Supernovae

There are some dozen supernovae (SNe) associated with long Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) have been confirmed. Most of previous studies derive the physical properties of the GRB-SNe by fitting the constructed (psuedo-)bolometric light curves. However, many GRB-SNe have only a few filter data, for which the (psuedo-)bolometric light curves are very difficult to be constructed. Additionally, constructing (psuedo-)bolometric light curves rely on some assumptions. In this paper, we use the multi-band broken power-law plus $^{56}$Ni model to fit the multi-band light curves of the afterglows and the SNe (SN~2001ke, SN~2013dx, and SN~2016jca) associated with three GRBs (GRB~011121, GRB~130702A, and GRB~161219B). We find our model can account for the multi-band light curves of the three GRB-SNe (except for the late-time $z-$band light curves of two events), indicating that the model is a reliable model. The $^{56}$Ni masses we derive are higher than that in the literature. This might be due to the fact that the $^{56}$Ni masses in the literature are usually obtained by fitting the psuedo-bolometric light curves whose luminosities are usually (significantly) underestimated. We suggest that the multi-band model can not only be used to fit the multi-band light curves of GRB-SNe that have many filter observations, but also fit those having sparse data.

preprint2022arXiv

Using the Optical--NIR Spectral Energy Distributions To Search for the Evidence of Dust Formation of 66 Supernovae

In this paper, we searched for the dust formation evidence of 66 supernovae (SNe) by using the blackbody model and the blackbody plus dust {emission} model to fit their early$-$time optical$-$near infrared (NIR) spectral energy distributions (SEDs). We find that, while the blackbody model can fit most SEDs of the SNe in our sample, the model cannot fit the SEDs of some SNe, in which the SEDs of 2 SNe (SNe~2010bq and 2012ca) show NIR excesses which can be attributed to the emission from the heated dust. We use blackbody plus dust emission model to fit the SEDs showing NIR excesses, finding that both graphite and silicate dust models can fit the SEDs, and the graphite model get reasonable temperatures or better fits. Assuming that the dust is graphite, the best-fitting temperatures (masses) of the dust of the SNe~2010bq and 2012ca are $\sim 1300-1800$ K ($\sim 0.1-3.4 \times 10^{-4}$ M$_\odot$) and $\sim 600-1000$ K ($\sim 0.6-7.5 \times 10^{-3}$ M$_\odot$), respectively. We compare the vaporization radii and the blackbody radii of the dust shells of the 2 SNe with the upper limits of the ejecta radii of the SNe at the first epochs, and demonstrate that the NIR excesses of the SEDs of the 2 SNe might be caused by the pre-existing dust.