Researcher profile

Jiaben Lin

Jiaben Lin contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

A Non-Linear Magnetic Field Calibration Method for Filter-Based Magnetographs by Multilayer Perceptron

For filter-based magnetographs, the linear calibration method under the weak-field assumption is usually adopted; this leads to magnetic saturation effect in the regions with strong magnetic field. This article explores a new method to overcome the above disadvantage using a multilayer perceptron network, which we call MagMLP, based on a back-propagation algorithm with one input layer, five hidden layers, and one output layer. We use the data from the \textit{Spectropolarimeter} (SP) on board \textit{Hinode} to simulate single-wavelength observations for the model training, and take into account the influence of the Doppler velocity field and the filling factor. The training results show that the linear fitting coefficient (LFC) of the transverse field reaches above 0.91, and that of the longitudinal field is above 0.98. The generalization of the models is good because the corresponding LFCs are above 0.9 for the test subsets. Compared with the linear calibration method, the MagMLP is much more effective on dealing with the magnetic saturation effect. Analyzing an active region, the results of the linear calibration present an evident magnetic saturation effect in the umbra regions; the corresponding systematic error reaches values greater than 1000 G in most areas, or even exceeds 2000 G at some pixels. However, the results of MagMLP at these locations are very close to the inversion results, and the systematic errors are basically within 300 G. In addition, we find that there are many "bright spots" and "dark spots" on the inclination angle images from the inversion results of \textit{Hinode}/SP with values of 180 and 0 degrees, respectively, where the inversion is not reliable and does not produce a good result; the MagMLP handles these points well.

preprint2020arXiv

A nonlinear solar magnetic field calibration method for the filter-based magnetograph by the residual network

The method of solar magnetic field calibration for the filter-based magnetograph is normally the linear calibration method under weak-field approximation that cannot generate the strong magnetic field region well due to the magnetic saturation effect. We try to provide a new method to carry out the nonlinear magnetic calibration with the help of neural networks to obtain more accurate magnetic fields. We employed the data from Hinode/SP to construct a training, validation and test dataset. The narrow-band Stokes I, Q, U, and V maps at one wavelength point were selected from all the 112 wavelength points observed by SP so as to simulate the single-wavelength observations of the filter-based magnetograph. We used the residual network to model the nonlinear relationship between the Stokes maps and the vector magnetic fields. After an extensive performance analysis, it is found that the trained models could infer the longitudinal magnetic flux density, the transverse magnetic flux density, and the azimuth angle from the narrow-band Stokes maps with a precision comparable to the inversion results using 112 wavelength points. Moreover, the maps that were produced are much cleaner than the inversion results. The method can effectively overcome the magnetic saturation effect and infer the strong magnetic region much better than the linear calibration method. The residual errors of test samples to standard data are mostly about 50 G for both the longitudinal and transverse magnetic flux density. The values are about 100 G with our previous method of multilayer perceptron, indicating that the new method is more accurate in magnetic calibration.