Source author record

Jeroen J. A. Keiren

Jeroen J. A. Keiren appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Logic in Computer Science eess.SY Systems and Control

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works

3topics

2close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2022arXiv

Formal verification of an industrial UML-like model using mCRL2 (extended version)

Low-code development platforms are gaining popularity. Essentially, such platforms allow to shift from coding to graphical modeling, helping to improve quality and reduce development time. The Cordis SUITE is a low-code development platform that adopts the Unified Modeling Language (UML) to design complex machine-control applications. In this paper we introduce Cordis models and their semantics. To enable formal verification, we define an automatic translation of Cordis models to the process algebraic specification language mCRL2. As a proof of concept, we describe requirements of the control software of an industrial cylinder model developed by Cordis, and show how these can be verified using model checking. We show that our verification approach is effective to uncover subtle issues in the industrial model and its implementation.

preprint2016arXiv

Stuttering equivalence is too slow!

Groote and Wijs recently described an algorithm for deciding stuttering equivalence and branching bisimulation equivalence, acclaimed to run in $\mathcal{O}(m \log n)$ time. Unfortunately, the algorithm does not always meet the acclaimed running time. In this paper, we present two counterexamples where the algorithms uses $Ω(md)$ time. A third example shows that the correction is not trivial. In order to analyse the problem we present pseudocode of the algorithm, and indicate the time that can be spent on each part of the algorithm in order to meet the desired bound. We also propose fixes to the algorithm such that it indeed runs in $\mathcal{O}(m \log n)$ time.